Reverting some deleted tests and changing the deprecated algo
Deleting deprecated headers from /alt-dummy dir
Corrections to the comments
Removal of deleted functions from compat-2.x.h
Corrections to tests/data_files/Makefile
Signed-off-by: TRodziewicz <tomasz.rodziewicz@mobica.com>
Also make sure to initialize the DRBG before using it in fuzz_server
(dummy_random uses ctr_drbg internally).
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Merge part of the RSA entries into this one, as I think it's easier for
users to have all similar changes in one place regardless of whether
they were introduce in the same PR or not.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
We know that Montgomery multiplication will never be called without an
RNG, so make that clear from the beginning of the function.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
It was used to remove the code used when mbedtls_ecp_mul() received a
NULL RNG parameter. This code is no longer relevant (as the RNG may no
longer be NULL) and will be unconditionally removed in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
This is necessary for the case where the public part of an EC keypair
needs to be computed from the private part - either because it was not
included (it's an optional component) or because it was compressed (a
format we can't parse).
This changes the API of two public functions: mbedtls_pk_parse_key() and
mbedtls_pk_parse_keyfile().
Tests and programs have been adapted. Some programs use a non-secure RNG
(from the test library) just to get things to compile and run; in a
future commit this should be improved in order to demonstrate best
practice.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
- mbedtls_ecp_check_pub_priv() because it calls ecp_mul()
- mbedtls_pk_check_pair() because it calls the former
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
It was indirectly calling ecp_mul() without an RNG. That's actually the
rare case where this should be allowed, as ecp_muladd() is typically
used on non-secret data (to verify signatures or ZKPs) and documented as
not being constant-time.
Refactor a bit in order to keep the ability to call ecp_mul() without a
RNG, but not exposed publicly (except though muladd).
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Fix trivial faulty calls in ECP test suite and ECP/ECJPAKE self-tests (by
adding a dummy RNG).
Several tests suites are not passing yet, as a couple of library
function do call ecp_mul() with a NULL RNG. The complexity of the fixes
range from "simple refactoring" to "requires API changes", so these will
be addressed in separate commits.
This makes the option MBEDTLS_ECP_NO_INTERNAL_RNG, as well as the whole
"internal RNG" code, obsolete. This will be addressed in a future
commit, after getting the test suites to pass again.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
(This commit is best reviewed using `git show -b` as indentation levels
have changed.)
The documentation already states that the RNG parameter is mandatory,
since PRs #4488 and #4515. There are several families of functions to
consider here:
- private-key operations (sign, decrypt) all call
mbedtls_rsa_private() where this commit adds a non-NULL check;
- encrypt operations need an RNG for masking/padding and already had a
non-NULL check since #4515 (conditional on \p mode before that)
- verify operations no longer take an RNG parameter since #4515
So, after this commit, all RSA functions that accept an RNG will reach a
non-NULL check before the RNG is used.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Not adding a check in the code here, as this will be checked by the
lower-level modules.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
No change here, these were already mandatory, it just wasn't explicit in
the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
mbedtls_dhm_get_value can be seen as either a copy function or a getter
function. Given the name and the semantics, it's more of a getter, even if
it "gets" by doing a copy. Therefore, put the context first, and the
selector next, leaving the output for last.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>