Unrelated to RSA (only used in ECP), but while improving one
mbedtls_safe_cond_xxx function, let's improve the other as well.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
mbedtls_mpi_cf_bool_eq() is a verbatim copy of mbedtls_ssl_cf_bool_eq()
Deduplication will be part of a future task.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Calling mbedtls_mpi_cmp_int reveals the number of leading zero limbs
to an adversary who is capable of very fine-grained timing
measurements. This is very little information, but could be practical
with secp521r1 (1/512 chance of the leading limb being 0) if the
adversary can measure the precise timing of a large number of
signature operations.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The idiom "resize an mpi to a given size" appeared 4 times. Unify it
in a single function. Guarantee that the value is set to 0, which is
required by some of the callers and not a significant expense where
not required.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Since the internal function mpi_fill_random_internal() assumes that X
has the right size, there is no need to call grow().
To further simplify the function, set the sign outside, and zero out
the non-randomized part directly.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Note that this error has a negligible probability with a "crypto-sized"
bound, but macroscopic probability with a small bound.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
In real life, min << N and the probability that mbedtls_mpi_random()
fails to find a suitable value after 30 iterations is less than one in
a billion. But at least for testing purposes, it's useful to not
outright reject "silly" small values of N, and for such values, 30
iterations is not enough to have a good probability of success.
Pick 250 iterations, which is enough for cases like (min=3, N=4), but
not for cases like (min=255, N=256).
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Do more iterations with small values. This makes it more likely that a
mistake on bounds will be detected.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
This comment is no longer in the specific context of generating a
random point on an elliptic curve.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Slightly simplify is_significantly_above_a_power_of_2() to make it
easier to understand:
* Remove the explicit negative answer for x <= 4. The only functional
difference this makes is that is_significantly_above_a_power_of_2(3)
is now true.
* Shift the most significant bit of x to position 8 rather than 15.
This makes the final comparison easier to explain.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Add unit tests for mbedtls_mpi_fill_random() and mbedtls_mpi_random()
when the resulting MPI object previously had a nonzero value. I wrote
those to catch a bug that I introduced during the development of
mbedtls_mpi_random() (but does not appear in a committed version).
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
mbedtls_mpi_random() uses mbedtls_mpi_cmp_mpi_ct(), which requires its
two arguments to have the same storage size. This was not the case
when the upper bound passed to mbedtls_mpi_random() had leading zero
limbs.
Fix this by forcing the result MPI to the desired size. Since this is
not what mbedtls_mpi_fill_random() does, don't call it from
mbedtls_mpi_random(), but instead call a new auxiliary function.
Add tests to cover this and other conditions with varying sizes for
the two arguments.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Instead of generating blinding values and keys in a not-quite-uniform way
(https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/issues/4245) with copy-pasted code,
use mbedtls_mpi_random().
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
dhm_make_common includes a piece of code that is identical to
dhm_random_below except for returning a different error code in one
case. Call dhm_random_below instead of repeating the code.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
P-1 is as bad as 1 as a blinding value. Don't accept it.
The chance that P-1 would be randomly generated is infinitesimal, so
this is not a practical issue, but it makes the code cleaner. It was
inconsistent to accept P-1 as a blinding value but not as a private key.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Unify the common parts of mbedtls_dhm_make_params and mbedtls_dhm_make_public.
No intended behavior change, except that the exact error code may
change in some corner cases which are too exotic for the existing unit
tests.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
mbedtls_dhm_make_params() with x_size != size of P is not likely to be
useful, but it's supported, so test it.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Repeat a few tests that use random data. This way the code is
exercised with a few different random values.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Improve the validation of the output from mbedtls_dhm_make_params:
* Test that the output in the byte buffer matches the value in the
context structure.
* Test that the calculated values are in the desired range.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Instead of generating blinding values in a not-quite-uniform way
(https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/issues/4245) with copy-pasted
code, use mbedtls_mpi_random().
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
