For time being, there are only two aes implementations for known
architectures. I define runtime detection function as const when
built-in was disabled. In this case, compiler will remove dead
built-in code.
Signed-off-by: Jerry Yu <jerry.h.yu@arm.com>
Have clearly separated code to:
* determine whether the assembly-based implementation is available;
* determine whether the intrinsics-based implementation is available;
* select one of the available implementations if any.
Now MBEDTLS_AESNI_HAVE_CODE can be the single interface for aes.c and
aesni.c to determine which AESNI is built.
Change the implementation selection: now, if both implementations are
available, always prefer assembly. Before, the intrinsics were used if
available. This preference is to minimize disruption, and will likely
be revised in a later minor release.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Clang is nice enough to support bitwise operators on __m128i, but MSVC
isn't.
Also, __cpuid() in MSVC comes from <intrin.h> (which is included via
<emmintrin.h>), not <cpuid.h>.
Signed-off-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
As of this commit, to use the intrinsics for MBEDTLS_AESNI_C:
* With MSVC, this should be the default.
* With Clang, build with `clang -maes -mpclmul` or equivalent.
* With GCC, build with `gcc -mpclmul -msse2` or equivalent.
In particular, for now, with a GCC-like compiler, when building specifically
for a target that supports both the AES and GCM instructions, the old
implementation using assembly is selected.
This method for platform selection will likely be improved in the future.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Uncrustify indents
```
asm("foo"
HELLO "bar"
"wibble");
```
but we would like
```
asm("foo"
HELLO "bar"
"wibble");
```
Make "bar" an argument of the macro HELLO, which makes the indentation from
uncrustify match the semantics (everything should be aligned to the same
column).
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The warning is only correct if the assembly code for AESNI is built, not if
MBEDTLS_AESNI_C is activated but MBEDTLS_HAVE_ASM is disabled or the target
architecture isn't x86_64.
This is a partial fix for #7236.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The following code:
#ifndef asm
#define asm __asm
#endif
causes Uncrustify to stop correcting the rest of the file. This may be
due to parsing the "asm" keyword in the definition.
Work around this by wrapping the idiom in an *INDENT-OFF* comment
wherever it appears.
Signed-off-by: David Horstmann <david.horstmann@arm.com>
`aesni.h` is an internal header and is moved accordingly.
Also removes some references to internal headers in scripts with
only public headers.
Signed-off-by: Chris Jones <christopher.jones@arm.com>
As a result, the copyright of contributors other than Arm is now
acknowledged, and the years of publishing are no longer tracked in the
source files.
Also remove the now-redundant lines declaring that the files are part of
MbedTLS.
This commit was generated using the following script:
# ========================
#!/bin/sh
# Find files
find '(' -path './.git' -o -path './3rdparty' ')' -prune -o -type f -print | xargs sed -bi '
# Replace copyright attribution line
s/Copyright.*Arm.*/Copyright The Mbed TLS Contributors/I
# Remove redundant declaration and the preceding line
$!N
/This file is part of Mbed TLS/Id
P
D
'
# ========================
Signed-off-by: Bence Szépkúti <bence.szepkuti@arm.com>
In library source files, include "common.h", which takes care of
including "mbedtls/config.h" (or the alternative MBEDTLS_CONFIG_FILE)
and other things that are used throughout the library.
FROM=$'#if !defined(MBEDTLS_CONFIG_FILE)\n#include "mbedtls/config.h"\n#else\n#include MBEDTLS_CONFIG_FILE\n#endif' perl -i -0777 -pe 's~\Q$ENV{FROM}~#include "common.h"~' library/*.c 3rdparty/*/library/*.c scripts/data_files/error.fmt scripts/data_files/version_features.fmt
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Clang-Msan is known to report spurious errors when MBEDTLS_AESNI_C is
enabled, due to the use of assembly code. The error reports don't
mention AES, so they can be difficult to trace back to the use of
AES-NI. Warn about this potential problem at compile time.
On x32 systems, pointers are 4-bytes wide and are therefore stored in %e?x
registers (instead of %r?x registers). These registers must be accessed using
"addl" instead of "addq", however the GNU assembler will acccept the generic
"add" instruction and determine the correct opcode based on the registers
passed to it.
