Don't use string literals that are longer than 4095 bytes, which is
the minimum that C99 compilers are required to support. Compilers are
extremely likely to support longer literals, but `gcc -std=c99 -pedantic`
complains.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
<stdio.h> only declares the non-ISO-C function fileno() if an
appropriate POSIX symbol is defined or if using a compiler such as GCC
in non-pedantic mode. Define the appropriate POSIX symbol.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
It works in practice on almost every platform, given that we're only
using the wrong type in cases where the value is guaranteed to stay
within the value bits of a signed int. But even in this case it may or
may not be strictly conforming. Anyway `gcc -std=c99 -pedantic`
rejects it.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
GCC and Clang accept
```
typedef struct foo foo_t;
typedef struct foo { ... } foo_t;
```
But this is not valid ISO C due to the redefinition of `foo_t`.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
It started out as be experimental, but it is now robust enough not to
break the rest, so there's no reason to leave it out.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
A file generated based on the output of `make list` from programs has been
re-generated.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
When parsing a certificate with the basic constraints extension
the max_pathlen that was read from it was incremented regardless
of its value. However, if the max_pathlen is equal to INT_MAX (which
is highly unlikely), an undefined behaviour would occur.
This commit adds a check to ensure that such value is not accepted
as valid. Relevant tests for INT_MAX and INT_MAX-1 are also introduced.
Certificates added in this commit were generated using the
test_suite_x509write, function test_x509_crt_check. Input data taken
from the "Certificate write check Server1 SHA1" test case, so the generated
files are like the "server1.crt", but with the "is_ca" field set to 1 and
max_pathlen as described by the file name.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Kurek <andrzej.kurek@arm.com>
Enable MBEDTLS_X509_ALLOW_EXTENSIONS_NON_V3 in the full config. There's
no reason to keep it out. We weren't testing it at all on the CI.
Add a missing dependency on !MBEDTLS_X509_ALLOW_EXTENSIONS_NON_V3 to
some test cases that either were testing that v3 extensions are only
accepted in v3 certificates, or where parsing returns a different
error when MBEDTLS_X509_ALLOW_EXTENSIONS_NON_V3 is enabled.
Add a few positive and negative test cases with
MBEDTLS_X509_ALLOW_EXTENSIONS_NON_V3 enabled.
Fix one test case with MBEDTLS_X509_ALLOW_EXTENSIONS_NON_V3 where the
intended output of mbedtls_x509_crt_info had changed in
890819a597 but the test case was missed
because it was never executed.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The intended logic around MBEDTLS_xxx_ALT is to exclude them from full
because they require the alternative implementation of one or more
library functions, except that MBEDTLS_PLATFORM_xxx_ALT are different:
they're alternative implementations of a platform function and they
have a built-in default, so they should be included in full. Document
this.
Fix a bug whereby MBEDTLS_PLATFORM_xxx_ALT didn't catch symbols where
xxx contains an underscore. As a consequence,
MBEDTLS_PLATFORM_GMTIME_R_ALT and MBEDTLS_PLATFORM_NV_SEED_ALT are now
enabled in the full config. Explicitly exclude
MBEDTLS_PLATFORM_SETUP_TEARDOWN_ALT because it behaves like the
non-platform ones, requiring an extra build-time dependency.
Explicitly exclude MBEDTLS_PLATFORM_NV_SEED_ALT from baremetal
because it requires MBEDTLS_ENTROPY_NV_SEED, and likewise explicitly
unset it from builds that unset MBEDTLS_ENTROPY_NV_SEED.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The presence of these markers in the original code was helpful to me in
figuring out that this portion of the code is auto-generated.
Therefore, I think those are useful and should be present.
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Aggarwal <aggarg@amazon.com>
