I might be wrong, but lcc's optimizer is curious about this,
and I am too: shouldn't we free allocated stuff correctly
before exiting `dh_genprime` in this certain point of code?
Signed-off-by: makise-homura <akemi_homura@kurisa.ch>
Use list of executables to:
- factorize the code to define executables
- highlight the similarities and differences of the executable definitions
- avoid list duplication
Use alphabetic order for executables in lists.
Signed-off-by: Ronald Cron <ronald.cron@arm.com>
Convert all text files to Unix line endings unless they're Windows
stuff.
Make sure that all text files have a trailing newline.
Remove whitespace at the end of lines.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
It works in practice on almost every platform, given that we're only
using the wrong type in cases where the value is guaranteed to stay
within the value bits of a signed int. But even in this case it may or
may not be strictly conforming. Anyway `gcc -std=c99 -pedantic`
rejects it.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
When building with CMake, for sample programs that only use
functionality in libmbedcrypto (i.e. crypto and platform), link with
libmbedcrypto, not with libmbedtls.
This doesn't change the result, because the linker skips libraries in
which no symbol is used, but it changes the build dependencies, and it
has the advantage of bringing programs/*/CMakeLists.txt closer to the
corresponding files under crypto/.
The programs concerned are crypto sample and test programs, and
programs that only use (potential) platform functions such as
mbedtls_printf. dh_client and dh_server keep linking with mbedtls
because they use functions from the net_sockets module.
There is some commented out X.509 certificate writing code present in
rsa_genkey. It looks like it has been commented out since the beginning
of time. Let's remove it, since commented out code is not in good style.
This is done to account for platforms, for which we want custom behavior
upon the program termination, hence we call `mbedtls_exit()` instead of
returning from `main()`.
* restricted/pr/573:
Remove redundant config.pl call
Add a test for signing content with a long ECDSA key
Add documentation notes about the required size of the signature buffers
Add missing MBEDTLS_ECP_C dependencies in check_config.h
Change size of preallocated buffer for pk_sign() calls
All sample and test programs had a definition of mbedtls_param_failed.
This was necessary because we wanted to be able to build them in a
configuration with MBEDTLS_CHECK_PARAMS set but without a definition
of MBEDTLS_PARAM_FAILED. Now that we activate the sample definition of
MBEDTLS_PARAM_FAILED in config.h when testing with
MBEDTLS_CHECK_PARAMS set, this boilerplate code is no longer needed.
The previous prototype gave warnings are the strings produced by #cond and
__FILE__ are const, so we shouldn't implicitly cast them to non-const.
While at it modifying most example programs:
- include the header that has the function declaration, so that the definition
can be checked to match by the compiler
- fix whitespace
- make it work even if PLATFORM_C is not defined:
- CHECK_PARAMS is not documented as depending on PLATFORM_C and there is
no reason why it should
- so, remove the corresponding #if defined in each program...
- and add missing #defines for mbedtls_exit when needed
The result has been tested (make all test with -Werror) with the following
configurations:
- full with CHECK_PARAMS with PLATFORM_C
- full with CHECK_PARAMS without PLATFORM_C
- full without CHECK_PARAMS without PLATFORM_C
- full without CHECK_PARAMS with PLATFORM_C
Additionally, it has been manually tested that adding
mbedtls_aes_init( NULL );
near the normal call to mbedtls_aes_init() in programs/aes/aescrypt2.c has the
expected effect when running the program.
The sample programs require an additional handler function of
mbedtls_param_failed() to handle any failed parameter validation checks enabled
by the MBEDTLS_CHECK_PARAMS config.h option.
Some sample programs access structure fields directly. Making these work is
desirable in the long term, but these are not essential for the core
functionality in non-legacy mode.
When using a primality testing function the tolerable error rate depends
on the scheme in question, the required security strength and wether it
is used for key generation or parameter validation. To support all use
cases we need more flexibility than what the old API provides.
