Let the caller decide what certificates and keys are loaded (EC/RSA)
instead of loading both for the server, and an unspecified one
for the client. Use only DER encoding.
For each of the crypto-only presets, run the build and check that the
resulting libmbedx509 and libmbedtls are empty.
Don't bother testing, because for each crypto-only preset, another
component builds that plus the x509 and tls parts and tests
everything.
We already have a specific component in all.sh for testing SSLv3, we don't
need to also test it in components that aren't specifically about it.
Previously config.py full enabled SSLv3, but it no longer does since it is
deprecated.
The splitting of this test into two versions depending on whether SHA-1 was
allowed by the server was a mistake in
5d2511c4d4 - the test has nothing to do with
SHA-1 in the first place, as the server doesn't request a certificate from
the client so it doesn't matter if the server accepts SHA-1 or not.
While the whole script makes (often implicit) assumptions about the version of
GnuTLS used, generally speaking it should work out of the box with the version
packaged on our reference testing platform, which is Ubuntu 16.04 so far.
With the update from Jan 8 2020 (3.4.10-4ubuntu1.6), the patches for rejecting
SHA-1 in certificate signatures were backported, so we should avoid presenting
SHA-1 signed certificates to a GnuTLS peer in ssl-opt.sh.
Because two buffers were aliased too early in the code, it was possible that
after an allocation failure, free() would be called twice for the same pointer.
Previously mocked non-blocking read/write was returning 0 when buffer was empty/full. That was causing ERR_SSL_CONN_EOF error in tests which was using these mocked callbacks. Beside that non-blocking read/write was returning ERR_SSL_WANT_READ/_WRITE depending on block pattern set by test design. Such behavior forced to redesign of these functions so that they could be used in other tests
This error occurs when free space in the buffer is in the middle (the buffer has come full circle) and function mbedtls_test_buffer_put is called. Then the arguments for memcpy are calculated incorrectly and program ends with segmentation fault
If there was a fatal error (bizarre behavior from the standard
library, or missing test data file), execute_tests did not close the
outcome file. Fix this.
In a unit test we want to avoid accessing the network. To test the
handshake in the unit test suite we need to implement a connection
between the server and the client. This socket implementation uses
two ring buffers to mock the transport layer.
In a unit test we want to avoid accessing the network. To test the
handshake in the unit test suite we need to implement a connection
between the server and the client. This ring buffer implementation will
serve as the said connection.
The new macro ASSERT_ALLOC allocates memory with mbedtls_calloc and
fails the test if the allocation fails. It outputs a null pointer if
the requested size is 0. It is meant to replace existing calls to
mbedtls_calloc.
MBEDTLS_PK_SIGNATURE_MAX_SIZE is tested in Mbed Crypto. Its effect on
Mbed TLS is also tested via the X.509 tests. The case of
MBEDTLS_MPI_MAX_SIZE < MBEDTLS_ECDSA_MAX_LEN, for which this component
was added as a regression test, is covered by config-suite-b.h which
is tested via test-ref-configs.pl.
When running 'make test' with GNU make, if a test suite program
displays "PASSED", this was automatically counted as a pass. This
would in particular count as passing:
* A test suite with the substring "PASSED" in a test description.
* A test suite where all the test cases succeeded, but the final
cleanup failed, in particular if a sanitizer reported a memory leak.
Use the test executable's return status instead to determine whether
the test suite passed. It's always 0 on PASSED unless the executable's
cleanup code fails, and it's never 0 on any failure.
FixARMmbed/mbed-crypto#303
Some sanitizers default to displaying an error message and recovering.
This could result in a test being recorded as passing despite a
complaint from the sanitizer. Turn off sanitizer recovery to avoid
this risk.
