Probably the result of copy-pasting: the test functions actually don't
use those modules at all.
This brings the number of tests skipped in test_suite_rsa in
test_psa_crypto_config_accel_hash_use_psa down to 50 (from 61).
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
This brings the number of tests skipped in test_suite_rsa in
test_psa_crypto_config_accel_hash_use_psa down to 61 (from 117).
The changes to the test data file were generated with:
sed -i -f or_psa_hash.sed tests/suites/test_suite_rsa.data
with or_psa_hash.sed containing:
s/MBEDTLS_MD5_C/MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_ALG_MD5/g
s/MBEDTLS_RIPEMD160_C/MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_ALG_RIPEMD160/g
s/MBEDTLS_SHA1_C/MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_ALG_SHA_1/g
s/MBEDTLS_SHA224_C/MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_ALG_SHA_224/g
s/MBEDTLS_SHA256_C/MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_ALG_SHA_256/g
s/MBEDTLS_SHA384_C/MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_ALG_SHA_384/g
s/MBEDTLS_SHA512_C/MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_ALG_SHA_512/g
Here the MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_xxx macros are the right choice as we just need
data about the hashes to be available.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Same rationale as two commits ago.
Changes to the data file generated with the following script:
import hashlib
suite = 'rsa'
functions = {
'mbedtls_rsa_pkcs1_sign': (3, 1),
'mbedtls_rsa_pkcs1_verify': (3, 1),
}
def hash_ctx(s):
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_MD5':
return hashlib.md5()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA1':
return hashlib.sha1()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA224':
return hashlib.sha224()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA256':
return hashlib.sha256()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA384':
return hashlib.sha384()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA512':
return hashlib.sha512()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_RIPEMD160':
return hashlib.new("ripemd160")
def fix(l):
parts = l.rstrip().split(":")
fun = parts[0]
if fun not in functions:
return l
(alg_idx, msg_idx) = functions[fun]
alg_str = parts[alg_idx]
if alg_str == "MBEDTLS_MD_NONE" or alg_str == "255":
return l
h = hash_ctx(alg_str)
msg_str = parts[msg_idx]
msg_hex = msg_str[1:-1]
msg = bytes.fromhex(msg_hex)
h.update(msg)
msg_hash = h.hexdigest()
msg_hash_str = '"' + msg_hash + '"'
parts[msg_idx] = msg_hash_str
return ":".join(parts) + '\n'
filename = 'tests/suites/test_suite_' + suite + '.data'
with open(filename) as f:
lines = f.readlines()
lines = [fix(l) for l in lines]
with open(filename, 'w') as f:
f.writelines(lines)
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
This brings the number of tests skipped in test_suite_pkcs1_v15 in
test_psa_crypto_config_accel_hash_use_psa to 0.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
We had a message in the data file, and were computing its hash in the
test function. It is more efficient (and simpler when it comes to
dependencies) to directly have the message hash in the data file.
It was probably this way because some test vectors provide the message
for the sake of all-in-one implementation that hash-and-sign at once.
But our API gets a hash as the input and signs it. In unit tests, this
should be reflected in the signature of the test function, which should
take a hash as input.
The changes to the .data file were done using the following python
script:
import hashlib
suite = 'pkcs1_v15'
functions = {
'pkcs1_rsassa_v15_sign': (10, 12),
'pkcs1_rsassa_v15_verify': (6, 8),
}
def hash_ctx(s):
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_MD5':
return hashlib.md5()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA1':
return hashlib.sha1()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA224':
return hashlib.sha224()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA256':
return hashlib.sha256()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA384':
return hashlib.sha384()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA512':
return hashlib.sha512()
def fix(l):
parts = l.rstrip().split(":")
fun = parts[0]
if fun not in functions:
return l
(alg_idx, msg_idx) = functions[fun]
alg_str = parts[alg_idx]
if alg_str == "MBEDTLS_MD_NONE":
return l
h = hash_ctx(alg_str)
msg_str = parts[msg_idx]
msg_hex = msg_str[1:-1]
msg = bytes.fromhex(msg_hex)
h.update(msg)
msg_hash = h.hexdigest()
msg_hash_str = '"' + msg_hash + '"'
parts[msg_idx] = msg_hash_str
return ":".join(parts) + '\n'
filename = 'tests/suites/test_suite_' + suite + '.data'
with open(filename) as f:
lines = f.readlines()
lines = [fix(l) for l in lines]
with open(filename, 'w') as f:
f.writelines(lines)
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
The encrypt/decrypt cases don't depend on actually computing a hash,
just on information about it being available, and this information is
guarded by MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_xxx.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Currently just replacing existing uses, but the real point of having
these conditions as a single macro is that we'll be able to use them in
tests case dependencies, see next commit.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Having the whole .function file depend on SHA-1 was wrong: dependencies
in .function files are for compile-time dependencies all functions in
this file build just fine without SHA-1. It's just some tests cases that
do need SHA-1 at runtime, use dependencies on those specific tests in
the .data file then.
This reduces the number of cases skipped in this test suite in
test_psa_crypto_config_accel_hash_use_psa from 28 (all of them) down to
12 (those that actually use SHA-1 as opposed to no hash).
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Strategy for dependencies inside libmbecrypto, in particular in the PSA
Crypto core, are outside the scope of the present study.
Note: PR 6065, referenced in a few places, is the one that also
introduces the present commit. It kicks of the work towards G5 in parts
of the code governed by MBEDTLS_USE_PSA_CRYPTO.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
- lack of support for PSA_CRYPTO_CONFIG is not really a reason not to
enable MBEDTLS_USE_PSA_CRYPTO by default - while it's true that
currently X.509/TLS do not behave as expected when PSA_CRYPTO_CONFIG and
MBEDTLS_USE_PSA_CRYPTO are both enabled, it's no worse than when
MBEDTLS_USE_PSA_CRYPTO is disabled.
- as a consequence of removing the paragraph mentioned above, the
sub-section about PSA_CRYPTO_CONFIG no longer belongs in the
"compile-time option" section. Also, it's superseded by the study work
that happened in the meantime (of which this PR is part). So let's
remove it, and the new commit will add something more up-to-date
instead.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Not related to the changes in this PR, except in the next commit I'll
update the strategy document for changes in this PR and to outline
likely follow-ups, and while looking at the document I noticed a few
things that needed updated, so here there are in their own commit.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
test_suite_pk still passes, with the same number of skipped tests as in
the default config minus PKCS#1v2.1
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Applied:
sed -i -f use_psa_hash.sed tests/suites/test_suite_pk.*
with use_psa_hash.sed as follows:
s/MBEDTLS_MD5_C/MBEDTLS_USE_PSA_WANT_ALG_MD5/g
s/MBEDTLS_RIPEMD160_C/MBEDTLS_USE_PSA_WANT_ALG_RIPEMD160/g
s/MBEDTLS_SHA1_C/MBEDTLS_USE_PSA_WANT_ALG_SHA_1/g
s/MBEDTLS_SHA224_C/MBEDTLS_USE_PSA_WANT_ALG_SHA_224/g
s/MBEDTLS_SHA256_C/MBEDTLS_USE_PSA_WANT_ALG_SHA_256/g
s/MBEDTLS_SHA384_C/MBEDTLS_USE_PSA_WANT_ALG_SHA_384/g
s/MBEDTLS_SHA512_C/MBEDTLS_USE_PSA_WANT_ALG_SHA_512/g
With this commit, test_suite_pk achieves parity between:
- crypto_full minus PKCS#1v2.1
- same minus MD (from all.sh's test_crypto_full_no_md)
and between:
- default config plus use_psa minus PKCS#1v2.1
- same with accelerators (test_psa_crypto_config_accel_hash_use_psa)
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
While at it, also fix buffer size for functions that already depend on
USE_PSA: it should be PSA_HASH_MAX_SIZE for functions that always use
PSA, and the new macro MBEDTLS_USE_PSA_MD_MAX_SIZE for functions that
use it or not depending on USE_PSA.
The only case where MBEDTLS_MD_MAX_SIZE is OK is when the function
always uses MD - currently this is the case with
pk_sign_verify_restart() as it is incompatible with USE_PSA anyway.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Depending only of our software implementation was too strict. The
function can be useful when only the PSA implementation is available,
since oftentimes the algorithm will still be expressed as an md_type for
legacy reasons.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
For now in an internal header as it's the safest option and that way we
can change whenever we want.
Later on if we think the macros can be useful to applications as well then we
can move them to a public location.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Currently the test suites are passing because a lot of tests
functions/cases explicitly depend on SHAxxx_C, resulting in them being
skipped in this build. The goal of the next few commits is going to make
them pass and achieve test parity with a non-accelerated build for
selected modules.
Note: compared to the previous component, I'm using 'make tests' not
'make' (ie not building program) because I'm betting build failures
(some header not found) in programs which are not my interest atm.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
When MD is only used to compute a size, use md_internal.h instead.
When it's actually used to compute a hash, mark the test function as
depending on it. This is probably suboptimal in the long run, and we
might want to either adapt the code so that it can use PSA Crypto
instead, or just pre-compute the hash in the test data.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
The previous commit made the PKCS#1v1.5 part of rsa.c independent from
md.c, but there was still a dependency in the corresponding part in PSA.
This commit removes it.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
This is a step towards building with RSA PKCS#1v1.5 without MD.
Also loosen guards around oid data: the OID definitions clearly don't
depend on our software implementation.
We could simply have no dependency as this is just data. But for the
sake of code size, let's have some guards so that people who don't use
MD5, SHA1 or RIPEMD160 don't have to pay the price for them.
Note: this is used for RSA (PKCS#v1.5) signatures among other things, an
area that is not influenced by USE_PSA, so the guards should not depend
on it either.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
PKCS#1 v1.5 mostly does not need hash operations. This is a first step
towards allowing builds with PKCS#1 v1.5 only (no v2.1) without MD.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Modules / tests that only need to get the size of a hash from its type,
without actually computing a hash, need not depend on MD_C.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
