These macros were moved into a header and now check-names.sh is failing.
Add an MBEDTL_ prefix to the macro names to make it pass.
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
Negative x coordinate was tested with the value -1. It happens to be one
of the low order points both for Curve25519 and Curve448 and might be
rejected because of that and not because it is negative. Make sure that
x < 0 is the only plausible reason for the point to be rejected.
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
A test was added in that could cause a jump to exit prior to
initialisation of a pointer that would get freed if that test failed.
Signed-off-by: Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@arm.com>
The error is currently never returned to any function that PSA calls,
but keep mbedtls_to_psa_error up to date in case this changes.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The functions mbedtls_pk_sign(), mbedtls_pk_sign_restartable(),
mbedtls_ecdsa_write_signature() and mbedtls_ecdsa_write_signature_restartable()
now take an extra parameter indicating the size of the output buffer for the
signature.
No change to RSA because for RSA, the output size is trivial to calculate.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Fix typos in the PBKDF2 documentation
Correct the constraints on PSA_KEY_USAGE_DERIVE and PSA_KEY_USAGE_VERIFY_DERIVATION, aligning them with the note against psa_key_derivation_input_key(). All key inputs must have the required usage flag to permit output or verification.
Correct the constraints on PSA_KEY_DERIVATION_INPUT_SECRET and PSA_KEY_DERIVATION_INPUT_PASSWORD, aligning them with 4feb611. psa_key_derivation_verify_key() does not require the secret/password input to be a key.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thoelke <andrew.thoelke@arm.com>
We were already rejecting them at the end, due to the fact that with the
usual (x, z) formulas they lead to the result (0, 0) so when we want to
normalize at the end, trying to compute the modular inverse of z will
give an error.
If we wanted to support those points, we'd a special case in
ecp_normalize_mxz(). But it's actually permitted by all sources (RFC
7748 say we MAY reject 0 as a result) and recommended by some to reject
those points (either to ensure contributory behaviour, or to protect
against timing attack when the underlying field arithmetic is not
constant-time).
Since our field arithmetic is indeed not constant-time, let's reject
those points before they get mixed with sensitive data (in
ecp_mul_mxz()), in order to avoid exploitable leaks caused by the
special cases they would trigger. (See the "May the Fourth" paper
https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/806.pdf)
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
A test case for which the loop would take practically forever if it was
reached. The point would be to validate that the loop is not reached.
The test case should cause the CI to time out if starting with the
current code, ecp_check_pubkey_mx() was changed to call
ecp_check_pubkey_x25519() first and run the mbedtls_mpi_size(() test
afterwards, which would make no semantic difference in terms of memory
contents when the function returns, but would open the way for a DoS.
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
Various functions for PSA hash operations call abort
on failure; test that this is done. The PSA spec does not require
this behaviour, but it makes our implementation more robust in
case the user does not abort the operation as required by the
PSA spec.
Signed-off-by: Dave Rodgman <dave.rodgman@arm.com>
Without this parameter, it would be hard for callers to know how many bytes
of output the function wrote into the output buffer. It would be possible,
since the cumulated output must have the same length as the cumulated input,
but it would be cumbersome for the caller to keep track.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Various functions for PSA cipher and mac operations call abort
on failure; test that this is done. The PSA spec does not require
this behaviour, but it makes our implementation more robust in
case the user does not abort the operation as required by the
PSA spec.
Signed-off-by: Dave Rodgman <dave.rodgman@arm.com>
New functions are used to cover corner cases:
* authentication data is fed to gcm with 0, 1 or 2 calls to gcm_update
* ciphertext is fed to gcm with 0, 1 or 2 calls to gcm_update_ad
AES-GCM NIST test vectors downloaded at 16.06.2021 from:
csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cavp/documents/mac/gcmtestvectors.zip
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Starzyk <mateusz.starzyk@mobica.com>
The cipher_bad_order test happened to pass, but was not testing the
failure case it intended to test.
Signed-off-by: Dave Rodgman <dave.rodgman@arm.com>
PSA_KEY_LIFETIME_FROM_PERSISTENCE_AND_LOCATION shifts the location
value (location << 8). This can go outside the range of a 32-bit int
if the location value is above 2^23 as is the case here. Asan
rightfully complained about it. Make the value unsigned to avoid the
integer overflow.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Test keys with various persistence levels, enumerated from the
metadata tests.
For read-only keys, do not attempt to create or destroy the key
through the API, only to read a key that has been injected into
storage directly through filesystem access.
Do not test keys with a non-default location, since they require a
driver and we do not yet have a dependency mechanism to require the
presence of a driver for a specific location value.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
