- We don't check for NULL pointers this deep in the library
- Accessing a NULL pointer when the limb number is 0 as a mistake is the
very similar to any other out of bounds access
- We could potentially mandate at least 1 limb representation for 0 but
we either would need to enforce it or the implementation would be less
robust.
- Allowing zero limb representation - (NULL, 0) in particular - for zero
is present in the legacy interface, if we disallow it, the
compatibility code will need to deal with this (more code size and
opportunities for mistakes)
In summary, interpreting (NULL, 0) as the number zero in the core
interface is the least of the two evils.
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
The test case where there were extra limbs in the MPI failed and this
commit contains the corresponding fix as well. (We used to use the
minimum required limbs instead of the actual limbs present.)
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
Test data which is compared as a hex string now uses upper case to
match output of mbedtls_mpi_write_string() output. This removes usage
of strcasecmp().
Signed-off-by: Werner Lewis <werner.lewis@arm.com>
Cases where radix was explictly declared are removed in most cases,
replaced using script. bignum arguments are represented as hexadecimal
strings. This reduces clutter in test data and makes bit patterns
clearer.
Signed-off-by: Werner Lewis <werner.lewis@arm.com>
When USE_PSA is disabled and ECDSA_DETERMINISTIC is enabled, generating
ECDSA signatures via PK requires use of the hash via the MD layer (in
HMAC-DRBG, used by deterministic ECDSA).
When USE_PSA is enabled, ECDSA signatures via PK go through PSA which
always uses non-deterministic ECDSA, so does not rely on HMAC-DRBG/MD.
The condition used here is slightly too strong, but expressing exactly
the optimal condition seems more effort than it's worth for just 3 test
cases.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Using VIA_MD_OR_PSA_BASED_ON_USE_PSA was justified by the fact that
until a few commits ago, the test functions here computed hashes using
either MD or PSA, depending on whether USE_PSA was defined (which itself
was justified by the loose reasoning that "PK is USE_PSA territory").
A few commits ago, test code stopped computing hashes because the hash
values became part of the test data. PK itself does not compute hashes.
As a result, VIA_MD_OR_PSA_BASED_ON_USE_PSA is no longer justified.
There are now two kinds of tests:
- those that only rely on hash data (ECDSA, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5) should
depend on VIA_LOWLEVEL_OR_PSA as that is the minimal dependency, hence
the one used for data
- those that were the layer below PK will internally compute a hash (RSA
PKCS#1 v2.1): currently this hash is always computed using MD (on which
MBEDTLS_PKCS1_V21 depends), so legacy dependencies like MBEDTLS_SHA256_C
should be used for now. The previous dependency was morally wrong, it
didn't show in the driver-only tests only because PKCS#1 v2.1 is
disabled in this test for now.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Fix usage with sed:
s/MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_\([A-Z_0-9]*\)/MBEDTLS_HAS_\1_VIA_LOWLEVEL_OR_PSA/
s/MBEDTLS_USE_PSA_WANT_\([A-Z_0-9]*\)/MBEDTLS_HAS_\1_VIA_MD_OR_PSA_BASED_ON_USE_PSA/
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
We had a message in the data file, and were computing its hash in the
test function. It is more efficient (and simpler when it comes to
dependencies) to directly have the message hash in the data file.
It was probably this way because some test vectors provide the message
for the sake of all-in-one implementation that hash-and-sign at once.
But our API gets a hash as the input and signs it. In unit tests, this
should be reflected in the signature of the test function, which should
take a hash as input.
The changes to the .data file were done using the following python
script:
import hashlib
suite = 'pkcs1_v21'
functions = {
'pkcs1_rsassa_pss_sign': (6, 8),
'pkcs1_rsassa_pss_verify': (4, 6),
'pkcs1_rsassa_pss_verify_ext': (4, 8),
}
def hash_ctx(s):
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_MD5':
return hashlib.md5()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA1':
return hashlib.sha1()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA224':
return hashlib.sha224()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA256':
return hashlib.sha256()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA384':
return hashlib.sha384()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA512':
return hashlib.sha512()
def fix(l):
parts = l.rstrip().split(":")
fun = parts[0]
if fun not in functions:
return l
(digest_idx, msg_idx) = functions[fun]
alg_str = parts[digest_idx]
if alg_str == "MBEDTLS_MD_NONE":
return l
h = hash_ctx(alg_str)
msg_str = parts[msg_idx]
msg_hex = msg_str[1:-1]
msg = bytes.fromhex(msg_hex)
h.update(msg)
msg_hash = h.hexdigest()
msg_hash_str = '"' + msg_hash + '"'
parts[msg_idx] = msg_hash_str
return ":".join(parts) + '\n'
filename = 'tests/suites/test_suite_' + suite + '.data'
with open(filename) as f:
lines = f.readlines()
lines = [fix(l) for l in lines]
with open(filename, 'w') as f:
f.writelines(lines)
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
We had a message in the data file, and were computing its hash in the
test function. It is more efficient (and simpler when it comes to
dependencies) to directly have the message hash in the data file.
It was probably this way because some test vectors provide the message
for the sake of all-in-one implementation that hash-and-sign at once.
But our API gets a hash as the input and signs it. In unit tests, this
should be reflected in the signature of the test function, which should
take a hash as input.
The changes to the .data file were done using the following python
script:
import hashlib
suite = 'ecdsa'
functions = {
'ecdsa_det_test_vectors': (3, 4),
'ecdsa_write_restart': (3, 4),
}
def hash_ctx(s):
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_MD5':
return hashlib.md5()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA1':
return hashlib.sha1()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA224':
return hashlib.sha224()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA256':
return hashlib.sha256()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA384':
return hashlib.sha384()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA512':
return hashlib.sha512()
def fix(l):
parts = l.rstrip().split(":")
fun = parts[0]
if fun not in functions:
return l
(alg_idx, msg_idx) = functions[fun]
alg_str = parts[alg_idx]
if alg_str == "MBEDTLS_MD_NONE":
return l
h = hash_ctx(alg_str)
msg_str = parts[msg_idx][1:-1]
h.update(msg_str.encode('ascii'))
msg_hash = h.hexdigest()
msg_hash_str = '"' + msg_hash.upper() + '"'
parts[msg_idx] = msg_hash_str
return ":".join(parts) + '\n'
filename = 'tests/suites/test_suite_' + suite + '.data'
with open(filename) as f:
lines = f.readlines()
lines = [fix(l) for l in lines]
with open(filename, 'w') as f:
f.writelines(lines)
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
This is mostly:
sed -i 's/mbedtls_psa_translate_md/mbedtls_hash_info_psa_from_md/' \
library/*.c tests/suites/*.function
This should be good for code size as the old inline function was used
from 10 translation units inside the library, so we have 10 copies at
least.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Using static inline functions is bad for code size; the function from
md_internal.h was already used from 3 different C files, so already was
copied at least 3 times in the library, and this would only get worse
over time.
Use actual functions, and also share the actual data between them.
Provide a consistent set of operations. Conversion to/from
human-readable string was omitted for now but could be added later if
needed.
In the future, this can be used to replace other similar (inline)
functions that are currently scattered, including (but perhaps not
limited to):
- mbedtls_psa_translate_md() from psa_util.h
- mbedtls_md_info_from_psa() (indirectly) from psa_crypto_hash.h
- get_md_alg_from_psa() from psa_crypto_rsa.c
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Same rationale as previous "Rm useless use of MD" commits.
Here the first two test functions were already not depending on MD_C,
but the new version is much simpler, as it avoids having two versions of
the code depending on the value of USE_PSA.
Changes to the data file generated with the following Python script:
import hashlib
suite = 'pk'
functions = {
'pk_rsa_verify_test_vec': (2, 1, True),
'pk_rsa_verify_ext_test_vec': (2, 1, True),
'pk_sign_verify_restart': (6, 7, False),
}
def hash_ctx(s):
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_MD5':
return hashlib.md5()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA1':
return hashlib.sha1()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA224':
return hashlib.sha224()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA256':
return hashlib.sha256()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA384':
return hashlib.sha384()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA512':
return hashlib.sha512()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_RIPEMD160':
return hashlib.new("ripemd160")
def fix(l):
parts = l.rstrip().split(":")
fun = parts[0]
if fun not in functions:
return l
(alg_idx, msg_idx, is_hex) = functions[fun]
alg_str = parts[alg_idx]
if alg_str == "MBEDTLS_MD_NONE" or alg_str == "255":
return l
h = hash_ctx(alg_str)
msg_str = parts[msg_idx][1:-1]
msg = bytes.fromhex(msg_str) if is_hex else bytes(msg_str, 'ascii')
h.update(msg)
msg_hash = h.hexdigest()
msg_hash_str = '"' + msg_hash + '"'
parts[msg_idx] = msg_hash_str
return ":".join(parts) + '\n'
filename = 'tests/suites/test_suite_' + suite + '.data'
with open(filename) as f:
lines = f.readlines()
lines = [fix(l) for l in lines]
with open(filename, 'w') as f:
f.writelines(lines)
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Tests are not here to demonstrate best practice, but to test a specific
part of the code. Using an RNG provided by the test framework also makes
the test code more focused on what we actually mean to test.
This brings the number of tests skipped in test_suite_rsa in
test_psa_crypto_config_accel_hash_use_psa down to 0 (from 50).
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Probably the result of copy-pasting: the test functions actually don't
use those modules at all.
This brings the number of tests skipped in test_suite_rsa in
test_psa_crypto_config_accel_hash_use_psa down to 50 (from 61).
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
This brings the number of tests skipped in test_suite_rsa in
test_psa_crypto_config_accel_hash_use_psa down to 61 (from 117).
The changes to the test data file were generated with:
sed -i -f or_psa_hash.sed tests/suites/test_suite_rsa.data
with or_psa_hash.sed containing:
s/MBEDTLS_MD5_C/MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_ALG_MD5/g
s/MBEDTLS_RIPEMD160_C/MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_ALG_RIPEMD160/g
s/MBEDTLS_SHA1_C/MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_ALG_SHA_1/g
s/MBEDTLS_SHA224_C/MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_ALG_SHA_224/g
s/MBEDTLS_SHA256_C/MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_ALG_SHA_256/g
s/MBEDTLS_SHA384_C/MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_ALG_SHA_384/g
s/MBEDTLS_SHA512_C/MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_ALG_SHA_512/g
Here the MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_xxx macros are the right choice as we just need
data about the hashes to be available.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Same rationale as two commits ago.
Changes to the data file generated with the following script:
import hashlib
suite = 'rsa'
functions = {
'mbedtls_rsa_pkcs1_sign': (3, 1),
'mbedtls_rsa_pkcs1_verify': (3, 1),
}
def hash_ctx(s):
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_MD5':
return hashlib.md5()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA1':
return hashlib.sha1()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA224':
return hashlib.sha224()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA256':
return hashlib.sha256()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA384':
return hashlib.sha384()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA512':
return hashlib.sha512()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_RIPEMD160':
return hashlib.new("ripemd160")
def fix(l):
parts = l.rstrip().split(":")
fun = parts[0]
if fun not in functions:
return l
(alg_idx, msg_idx) = functions[fun]
alg_str = parts[alg_idx]
if alg_str == "MBEDTLS_MD_NONE" or alg_str == "255":
return l
h = hash_ctx(alg_str)
msg_str = parts[msg_idx]
msg_hex = msg_str[1:-1]
msg = bytes.fromhex(msg_hex)
h.update(msg)
msg_hash = h.hexdigest()
msg_hash_str = '"' + msg_hash + '"'
parts[msg_idx] = msg_hash_str
return ":".join(parts) + '\n'
filename = 'tests/suites/test_suite_' + suite + '.data'
with open(filename) as f:
lines = f.readlines()
lines = [fix(l) for l in lines]
with open(filename, 'w') as f:
f.writelines(lines)
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
This brings the number of tests skipped in test_suite_pkcs1_v15 in
test_psa_crypto_config_accel_hash_use_psa to 0.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
We had a message in the data file, and were computing its hash in the
test function. It is more efficient (and simpler when it comes to
dependencies) to directly have the message hash in the data file.
It was probably this way because some test vectors provide the message
for the sake of all-in-one implementation that hash-and-sign at once.
But our API gets a hash as the input and signs it. In unit tests, this
should be reflected in the signature of the test function, which should
take a hash as input.
The changes to the .data file were done using the following python
script:
import hashlib
suite = 'pkcs1_v15'
functions = {
'pkcs1_rsassa_v15_sign': (10, 12),
'pkcs1_rsassa_v15_verify': (6, 8),
}
def hash_ctx(s):
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_MD5':
return hashlib.md5()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA1':
return hashlib.sha1()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA224':
return hashlib.sha224()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA256':
return hashlib.sha256()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA384':
return hashlib.sha384()
if s == 'MBEDTLS_MD_SHA512':
return hashlib.sha512()
def fix(l):
parts = l.rstrip().split(":")
fun = parts[0]
if fun not in functions:
return l
(alg_idx, msg_idx) = functions[fun]
alg_str = parts[alg_idx]
if alg_str == "MBEDTLS_MD_NONE":
return l
h = hash_ctx(alg_str)
msg_str = parts[msg_idx]
msg_hex = msg_str[1:-1]
msg = bytes.fromhex(msg_hex)
h.update(msg)
msg_hash = h.hexdigest()
msg_hash_str = '"' + msg_hash + '"'
parts[msg_idx] = msg_hash_str
return ":".join(parts) + '\n'
filename = 'tests/suites/test_suite_' + suite + '.data'
with open(filename) as f:
lines = f.readlines()
lines = [fix(l) for l in lines]
with open(filename, 'w') as f:
f.writelines(lines)
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
The encrypt/decrypt cases don't depend on actually computing a hash,
just on information about it being available, and this information is
guarded by MBEDTLS_OR_PSA_WANT_xxx.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Having the whole .function file depend on SHA-1 was wrong: dependencies
in .function files are for compile-time dependencies all functions in
this file build just fine without SHA-1. It's just some tests cases that
do need SHA-1 at runtime, use dependencies on those specific tests in
the .data file then.
This reduces the number of cases skipped in this test suite in
test_psa_crypto_config_accel_hash_use_psa from 28 (all of them) down to
12 (those that actually use SHA-1 as opposed to no hash).
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
