Not related to other commits in this PR, should have been done in #8616
really, but since I'm updating the document, might as well do it here.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
All no_cipher components have crypto (as in libmbedcrypto.a), but the
difference is one doesn't have PSA crypto while the other two do.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Replaces calls to psa_unlock_key_slot with calls to psa_unregister_read.
All instances follow a pattern of a call to psa_get_and_lock_key_slot_X,
followed by some code which reads from a slot, followed by a call to psa_unregister_read.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Everett <ryan.everett@arm.com>
This does not yet implement destruction while a key is in use for psa_destroy_key;
that will be implemented in a separate pr.
(I am not sure if I am allowed to change the documentation in the include files.)
Signed-off-by: Ryan Everett <ryan.everett@arm.com>
Rename to psa_reserve_free_key_slot, as this function reserves a slot which is
free (not always empty) for filling.
Implement necessary state transitions and state checks.
Rename unlocked_persistent_key_slot to unused_persistent_key_slot.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Everett <ryan.everett@arm.com>
This inline function is used in every case we want to change the state of a slot,
except for where we do not care about what the state of the slot was before.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Everett <ryan.everett@arm.com>
Replaces psa_lock_key_slot and psa_unlock_key_slot.
Future commits will remove the calls to locking/unlocking functions,
and add calls to registering/unregistering functions.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Everett <ryan.everett@arm.com>
Remove psa_is_key_slot_occupied, any function which calls this can just check
the state variable instead.
Replace psa_is_key_slot_locked with psa_key_slot_has_readers.
References to the now removed functions are changed in future commits.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Everett <ryan.everett@arm.com>
Remove the `status` field and replace with the `state` field.
Remove the `lock_count` field and replace with the `registered_readers` field.
Add documentation which describes how and why these fields are to be used.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Everett <ryan.everett@arm.com>
secp224k1 is the one with 225-bit private keys.
The consequences of this mistake were:
* We emitted positive test cases for hypothetical SECP_R1_225 and
SECP_K1_224 curves, which were never executed.
* We emitted useless not-supported test cases for SECP_R1_225 and SECP_K1_224.
* We were missing positive test cases for SECP_R1_224 in automatically
generated tests.
* We were missing not-supported test cases for SECP_R1_224 and SECP_K1_225.
Thus this didn't cause test failures, but it caused missing test coverage
and some never-executed test cases.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
All of ECP requires the bignum module and there is no plan to change that,
so guarding a few bits of code is just noise.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>