In order to remove large buffers from the stack, the der data is written
into the same buffer that the pem is eventually written into, however
although the pem data is zero terminated, there is now data left in the
buffer after the zero termination, which can cause
mbedtls_x509_crt_parse to fail to parse the same buffer if passed back
in. Patches also applied to mbedtls_pk_write_pubkey_pem, and
mbedtls_pk_write_key_pem, which use similar methods of writing der data
to the same buffer, and tests modified to hopefully catch any future
regression on this.
Signed-off-by: Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@arm.com>
If any of the TEST_ASSERT()s that are before the call to
mbedtls_pk_warp_as_opaque() failed, when reaching the exit label
psa_destroy_key() would be called with an uninitialized argument.
Found by Clang.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
The documentation of mbedtls_pk_wrap_as_opaque is quite clear:
* \param handle Output: a PSA key handle.
* It's the caller's responsibility to call
* psa_destroy_key() on that handle after calling
* mbedtls_pk_free() on the PK context.
But the test failed to call psa_destroy_key().
While at it, also use PSA_DONE(): it ensures that if we fail to destroy the
key, we'll get an explicit error message about it without the need for
valgrind.
This is a preliminary to adding a valgrind-based test for constant-flow code:
we need to make sure the rest of the tests are fully valgrind-clean, which
they weren't.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Command to find the files in which lines have gone
larger than 79 characters due to the renaming:
grep '.\{80\}' \
`git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-only -r HEAD` \
| grep "\<mbedtls_test_rnd_"
Signed-off-by: Ronald Cron <ronald.cron@arm.com>
This leak wasn't discovered by the CI because the only test in
all.sh exercising the respective path enabled the custom memory
buffer allocator implementations of calloc() and free(), hence
bypassing ASan.
x509_get_name() does not make defensive copies of strings in its input (which
is OK as usually the caller will have made a copy already), so we shouldn't
reuse its input buffer as an output while "parsed" is still alive.
