Otherwise the error status can be PSA_ERROR_INVALID_SIGNATURE instead of the
expected PSA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED in some configurations. For example, the
RSA verification code currently checks the signature size first whenever
PSA_KEY_TYPE_RSA_PUBLIC_KEY is enabled, and only gets into
algorithm-specific code if this passes, so it returns INVALID_SIGNATURE even
if the specific algorithm is not supported.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The test suite test_suite_psa_crypto_op_fail now runs a large number
of automatically generated test cases which attempt to perform a
one-shot operation or to set up a multi-part operation with invalid
parameters. The following cases are fully covered (based on the
enumeration of valid algorithms and key types):
* An algorithm is not supported.
* The key type is not compatible with the algorithm (for operations
that use a key).
* The algorithm is not compatible for the operation.
Some test functions allow the library to return PSA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED
where the test code generator expects PSA_ERROR_INVALID_ARGUMENT or vice
versa. This may be refined in the future.
Some corner cases with algorithms combining a key agreement with a key
derivation are not handled properly. This will be fixed in follow-up
commits.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Test that hash operation functions fail when given a hash algorithm
that is not supported or an algorithm that is not a hash.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The new test suite psa_crypto_op_fail is intended for systematically
generated test cases that ensure that cryptographic operations with
invalid parameters fail as expected. I intend invalid parameters to
cover things like an invalid algorithm, an algorithm that is
incompatible with the operation, a key type that is incompatible with
the algorithm, etc.
This commit just creates the infrastructure. Subsequent commits will
add data generation and test code.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
