Otherwise $COMMAND_LINE_COMPONENTS would try to expand wildcard patterns
based on files in the current directory.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Was getting errors like:
In file included from /usr/include/limits.h:25:0,
from /usr/lib/gcc-cross/arm-linux-gnueabi/5/include-fixed/limits.h:168,
from /usr/lib/gcc-cross/arm-linux-gnueabi/5/include-fixed/syslimits.h:7,
from /usr/lib/gcc-cross/arm-linux-gnueabi/5/include-fixed/limits.h:34,
from ../include/mbedtls/check_config.h:30,
from ../include/mbedtls/build_info.h:81,
from common.h:26,
from asn1write.c:20:
/usr/include/features.h:367:25: fatal error: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory
There are two packages to choose from: armhf or armel. Since the comment
in all.sh says we're trying to be close to Debian's "armel"
architecture, choose that, and fix a comment that was mentioning
gnueabihf for no apparent reason.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Currently it can't be mandatory, since we can't install the required toolchain
on Jenkins right away.
Also, while at it, remove `SHELL='sh -x'` from the other arm5vte component; it
was a leftover from debugging.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
- Improves readability
- Will be useful when we introduce MPS as an alternative msg layer.
- Will be useful when we need to reset the messaging layer upon
receipt of a HelloRetryRequest in TLS 1.3.
Signed-off-by: Hanno Becker <hanno.becker@arm.com>
Have simpler patterns related to 'test' (the central objective being to keep
going if 'make test' or 'tests/...' fails, but not if 'make tests' fails).
Add 'cd' as a can't-keep-going command.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Count invocations from 1 to n instead of n to 1.
Explain how changing the loop variable would cause an error if the function
was not executed in a subshell.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Now that descriptions of error codes no longer have to be on the same line
for the sake of generate_errors.pl, move them to their own line before the
definition. This aligns them with what we do for other definitions, and
means that we no longer need to have very long lines containing both the C
definition and the comment.
```
perl -i -pe 's~^(#define +MBEDTLS_ERR_\w+ +-\w+) */\*[*!]<(.*)\*/~/**$2*/\n$1~' include/mbedtls/*.h
```
This commit does not change the output of generate_errors.pl.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
They were recognized by a prior commit. In this commit, replace line
breaks (with optional comment continuation marker) by spaces.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Before this commit, definitions of error codes must match a strict pattern,
with a Doxygen comment following the definition on the same line and
starting with "/**<". Change how generate_errors.pl so that the Doxygen
comment can be before the definition instead of after, and doesn't have to
be on the same line.
Also allow spaces between "#" and "define", and allow Doxygen comments to
start with "/*!" rather than "/**". Starting with "///" or "//!" is not
supported.
This commit does not change the output of generate_errors.pl.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Still check that encryption and decryption are inverse to each other
if the granularity does not match the one used in the KAT.
Signed-off-by: Hanno Becker <hanno.becker@arm.com>
This commit adds four known answer tests for TLS 1.3 record protection
from the following sources:
- RFC 8448 "Example Handshake Traces for TLS 1.3"
- tls13.ulfheim.net "The New Illustrated TLS Connection"
It extends the test coverage of the existing record protection tests
in the following ways:
- The existing record protection tests hand-craft record transform
structures; the new tests use the function
mbedtls_ssl_tls13_populate_transform()
from library source to create an TLS 1.3 transform from raw
key material and connection information.
- The existing record protection tests only check that encryption
and decryption are inverse to each other; as such, they don't
catch non-compliant implementations of encryption and decryption
which happen to be inverse to each other. By adding a known answer
test for TLS 1.3 record protection, can gain confidence that our
implementation is indeed standards-compliant.
Signed-off-by: Hanno Becker <hanno.becker@arm.com>