This commit finishes the removal of support for direct access to key
slots in psa_crypto.c.
This marks the end of the necessary phase of the transition to key
handles. The code should subsequently be refactored to move key slot
management from psa_crypto.c to psa_crypto_slot_management.c.
Switch from the direct use of slot numbers to handles allocated by
psa_allocate_key.
The general principle for each function is:
* Change `psa_key_slot_t slot` to `psa_key_handle_t handle` or
`psa_key_id_t key_id` depending on whether it's used as a handle to
an open slot or as a persistent name for a key.
* Call psa_create_key() before using a slot, instead of calling
psa_set_key_lifetime to make a slot persistent.
Remove the unit test persistent_key_is_configurable which is no longer
relevant.
Switch from the direct use of slot numbers to handles allocated by
psa_allocate_key.
This commit does not affect persistent key tests except for the one
test function in test_suite_psa_crypto that uses persistent keys
(persistent_key_load_key_from_storage).
The general principle for each function is:
* Change `psa_key_slot_t slot` to `psa_key_handle_t handle`.
* Call psa_allocate_key() before setting the policy of the slot,
or before creating key material in functions that don't set a policy.
* Some PSA_ERROR_EMPTY_SLOT errors become PSA_ERROR_INVALID_HANDLE
because there is now a distinction between not having a valid
handle, and having a valid handle to a slot that doesn't contain key
material.
* In tests that use symmetric keys, calculate the max_bits parameters
of psa_allocate_key() from the key data size. In tests where the key
may be asymmetric, call an auxiliary macro KEY_BITS_FROM_DATA which
returns an overapproximation. There's no good way to find a good
value for max_bits with the API, I think the API should be tweaked.
Implement psa_allocate_key, psa_open_key, psa_create_key,
psa_close_key.
Add support for keys designated to handles to psa_get_key_slot, and
thereby to the whole API.
Allocated and non-allocated keys can coexist. This is a temporary
stage in order to transition from the use of direct slot numbers to
allocated handles only. Once all the tests and sample programs have
been migrated to use handles, the implementation will be simplified
and made more robust with support for handles only.
Programs must not include mbedtls/platform.h if MBEDTLS_PLATFORM_C is
not defined. Test suites don't need to include mbedtls/platform.h
because helpers.function takes care of it.
This commit also removes a stray `;` which is technically not standard C.
Add missing compilation guards that broke the build if either GCM or
CCM was not defined.
Add missing guards on test cases that require GCM or CBC.
The build and tests now pass for any subset of {MBEDTLS_CCM_C,
MBEDTLS_GCM_C}. There are still unused variables warnings if neither
is defined.
Write an all-bits-zero NV seed file for the tests. Without this, if
the seed file is not present when this test suite is executed, the
PSA module initialization will fail, causing most test cases to fail.
Also write an all-bits-zero NV seed file at the end. The test cases in
this test suite mess with the file, but subsequent test suites may
need it.
When testing with custom entropy sources, if MBEDTLS_ENTROPY_NV_SEED
is enabled at compile time but the NV seed source is not used at
runtime, mbedtls_entropy_func makes a second pass anyway. Cope with
this in the test code by telling the entropy module not to make this
second pass.
Add a function to configure entropy sources. For testing only.
Use it to test that the library initialization fails properly if there is no
entropy source.
It's better for names in the API to describe the "what" (opaque keys) rather
than the "how" (using PSA), at least since we don't intend to have multiple
function doing the same "what" in different ways in the foreseeable future.
Unfortunately the can_do wrapper does not receive the key context as an
argument, so it cannot check psa_get_key_information(). Later we might want to
change our internal structures to fix this, but for now we'll just restrict
opaque PSA keys to be ECDSA keypairs, as this is the only thing we need for
now. It also simplifies testing a bit (no need to test each key type).
While at it, clarify who's responsible for destroying the underlying key. That
can't be us because some keys cannot be destroyed and we wouldn't know. So
let's leave that up to the caller.
So far, make sure we test the following ciphersuites
without any fallback to non-PSA ciphers:
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-128-CCM
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-128-CCM-8
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-256-CCM
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-256-CCM-8
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-128-GCM-SHA256
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-256-GCM-SHA384
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-128-CBC-SHA
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-128-CBC-SHA256
TLS-ECDHE-ECDSA-WITH-AES-256-CBC-SHA384
