Parameter validation was previously performed and tested unconditionally
for the ChaCha/Poly modules. This commit therefore only needs go guard the
existing tests accordingly and use the appropriate test macros for parameter
validation.
Previously, one could change the definition of AES_VALIDATE_RET() to return
some other code than MBEDTLS_ERR_AES_BAD_INPUT_DATA, and the test suite
wouldn't notice. Now this modification would make the suite fail as expected.
The test framework for validation of parameters depends on the macro
MBEDTLS_PARAM_FAILED() being set to its default value when building the
library. So far the test framework attempted to define this macro but this was
the wrong place - this definition wouldn't be picked by the library.
Instead, a different approach is taken: skip those tests when the macro is
defined in config.h, as in that case we have no way to know if it will indeed
end up calling mbedtls_param_failed() as we need it to.
This commit was tested by manually ensuring that aes_invalid_params:
- passes (and is not skipped) in the default configuration
- is skipped when MBEDTLS_PARAM_FAILED() is defined in config.h
The previous prototype gave warnings are the strings produced by #cond and
__FILE__ are const, so we shouldn't implicitly cast them to non-const.
While at it modifying most example programs:
- include the header that has the function declaration, so that the definition
can be checked to match by the compiler
- fix whitespace
- make it work even if PLATFORM_C is not defined:
- CHECK_PARAMS is not documented as depending on PLATFORM_C and there is
no reason why it should
- so, remove the corresponding #if defined in each program...
- and add missing #defines for mbedtls_exit when needed
The result has been tested (make all test with -Werror) with the following
configurations:
- full with CHECK_PARAMS with PLATFORM_C
- full with CHECK_PARAMS without PLATFORM_C
- full without CHECK_PARAMS without PLATFORM_C
- full without CHECK_PARAMS with PLATFORM_C
Additionally, it has been manually tested that adding
mbedtls_aes_init( NULL );
near the normal call to mbedtls_aes_init() in programs/aes/aescrypt2.c has the
expected effect when running the program.
It was inconsistent between files: sometimes 3 arguments, sometimes one.
Align to 1 argument for the macro and 3 for the function, because:
- we don't need 3 arguments for the macro, it can add __FILE__ and __LINE__
in its expansion, while the function needs them as parameters to be correct;
- people who re-defined the macro should have flexibility, and 3 arguments
can give the impression they they don't have as much as they actually do;
- the design document has the macro with 1 argument, so let's stick to that.
Change the use of setjmp and longjmp in signalling parameter validation failures
when using the MBEDTLS_CHECK_PARAMS config.h option. This change allows
all calls which might result in a call to the parameter validation failure
handler to always be caught, even without use of the new macros, by placing a
setjmp() in the outer function which calls the test function, which the handler
can jump to.
This has several benefits:
* it allows us to remove the clang compiler warning (-Wclobbered) caused
by local auto variables being in the same function as the call to setjmp.
* removes the need to wrap all function calls in the test functions with the
TEST_ASSERT() macro. Now all parameter validation function calls should be
caught.
The tests for the ECDH key exchange that use the context accessed it
directly. This can't work with the new context, where we can't make any
assumptions about the implementation of the context. This commit works
around this problem and comes with the cost of allocating an extra
structures on the stack when executing the test.
One of the tests is testing an older interface for the sake of backward
compatibility. The new ECDH context is not backward compatible and this
test doesn't make any sense for it, therefore we skip this test in
non-legacy mode.
The recently added `mbedtls_ecdh_setup()` function is not used in the
tests yet. This commit adapts the tests to the new workflow.
Having done that, the old lifecycle is not tested anymore, so we add a
new test to ensure backward compatibility.
This commit introduces variants test-ca_utf8.crt,
test-ca_printablestring.crt and test-ca_uppercase.crt
of tests/data_files/test-ca.crt which differ from
test-ca.crt in their choice of string encoding and
upper and lower case letters in the DN field. These
changes should be immaterial to the recovation check,
and three tests are added that crl.pem, which applies
to test-ca.crt, is also considered as applying to
test-ca_*.crt.
The test files were generated using PR #1641 which
- adds a build instruction for test-ca.crt to
tests/data_files/Makefile which allows easy
change of the subject DN.
- changes the default string format from `PrintableString`
to `UTF8String`.
Specifically:
- `test-ca_utf8.crt` was generated by running
`rm test-ca.crt && make test-ca.crt`
on PR #1641.
- `test-ca_uppercase.crt`, too, was generated by running
`rm test-ca.crt && make test-ca.crt`
on PR #1641, after modifying the subject DN line in the build
instruction for `test-ca.crt` in `tests/data_files/Makefile`.
- `test-ca_printable.crt` is a copy of `test-ca.crt`
because at the time of this commit, `PrintableString` is
still the default string format.
This commit introduces variants test-ca_utf8.crt,
test-ca_printablestring.crt and test-ca_uppercase.crt
of tests/data_files/test-ca.crt which differ from
test-ca.crt in their choice of string encoding and
upper and lower case letters in the DN field. These
changes should be immaterial to the recovation check,
and three tests are added that crl.pem, which applies
to test-ca.crt, is also considered as applying to
test-ca_*.crt.
Extend the mbedtls_mpi_is_prime_det test to check that it reports
the number as prime when testing rounds-1 rounds, then reports the
number as composite when testing the full number of rounds.
When using a primality testing function the tolerable error rate depends
on the scheme in question, the required security strength and wether it
is used for key generation or parameter validation. To support all use
cases we need more flexibility than what the old API provides.
Primality tests have to deal with different distribution when generating
primes and when validating primes.
These new tests are testing if mbedtls_mpi_is_prime() is working
properly in the latter setting.
The new tests involve pseudoprimes with maximum number of
non-witnesses. The non-witnesses were generated by printing them
from mpi_miller_rabin(). The pseudoprimes were generated by the
following function:
void gen_monier( mbedtls_mpi* res, int nbits )
{
mbedtls_mpi p_2x_plus_1, p_4x_plus_1, x, tmp;
mbedtls_mpi_init( &p_2x_plus_1 );
mbedtls_mpi_init( &p_4x_plus_1 );
mbedtls_mpi_init( &x ); mbedtls_mpi_init( &tmp );
do
{
mbedtls_mpi_gen_prime( &p_2x_plus_1, nbits >> 1, 0,
rnd_std_rand, NULL );
mbedtls_mpi_sub_int( &x, &p_2x_plus_1, 1 );
mbedtls_mpi_div_int( &x, &tmp, &x, 2 );
if( mbedtls_mpi_get_bit( &x, 0 ) == 0 )
continue;
mbedtls_mpi_mul_int( &p_4x_plus_1, &x, 4 );
mbedtls_mpi_add_int( &p_4x_plus_1, &p_4x_plus_1, 1 );
if( mbedtls_mpi_is_prime( &p_4x_plus_1, rnd_std_rand,
NULL ) == 0 )
break;
} while( 1 );
mbedtls_mpi_mul_mpi( res, &p_2x_plus_1, &p_4x_plus_1 );
}
Functional tests for various payload sizes and output buffer sizes.
When the padding is bad or the plaintext is too large for the output
buffer, verify that function writes some outputs. This doesn't
validate that the implementation is time-constant, but it at least
validates that it doesn't just return early without outputting anything.
Add signing tests with 528-bit and 520-bit RSA keys with SHA-512. These
selections of key and hash size should lead to an error returned, as
there is not enough room for our chosen minimum salt size of two bytes
less than the hash size. These test the boundary around an available
salt length of 0 or -1 bytes.
The RSA keys were generated with OpenSSL 1.1.1-pre8.
$ openssl genrsa 520
Generating RSA private key, 520 bit long modulus (2 primes)
.............++++++++++++
.................++++++++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
MIIBPwIBAAJCANWgb4bludh0KFQBZcqWb6iJOmLipZ0L/XYXeAuwOfkWWjc6jhGd
B2b43lVnEPM/ZwGRU7rYIjd155fUUdSCBvO/AgMBAAECQgDOMq+zy6XZEjWi8D5q
j05zpRGgRRiKP/qEtB6BWbZ7gUV9DDgZhD4FFsqfanwjWNG52LkM9D1OQmUOtGGq
a9COwQIhD+6l9iIPrCkblQjsK6jtKB6zmu5NXcaTJUEGgW68cA7PAiENaJGHhcOq
/jHqqi2NgVbc5kWUD/dzSkVzN6Ub0AvIiBECIQIeL2Gw1XSFYm1Fal/DbQNQUX/e
/dnhc94X7s118wbScQIhAMPVgbDc//VurZ+155vYc9PjZlYe3QIAwlkLX3HYKkGx
AiEND8ndKyhkc8jLGlh8aRP8r03zpDIiZNKqCKiijMWVRYQ=
-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
$ openssl genrsa 528
Generating RSA private key, 528 bit long modulus (2 primes)
.........++++++++++++
....++++++++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
MIIBQgIBAAJDAKJVTrpxW/ZuXs3z1tcY4+XZB+hmbnv1p2tBUQbgTrgn7EyyGZz/
ZkkdRUGQggWapbVLDPXu9EQ0AvMEfAsObwJQgQIDAQABAkJhHVXvFjglElxnK7Rg
lERq0k73yqfYQts4wCegTHrrkv3HzqWQVVi29mGLSXTqoQ45gzWZ5Ru5NKjkTjko
YtWWIVECIgDScqoo7SCFrG3zwFxnGe7V3rYYr6LkykpvczC0MK1IZy0CIgDFeINr
qycUXbndZvF0cLYtSmEA+MoN7fRX7jY5w7lZYyUCIUxyiOurEDhe5eY5B5gQbJlW
ePHIw7S244lO3+9lC12U1QIhWgzQ8YKFObZcEejl5xGXIiQvBEBv89Y1fPu2YrUs
iuS5AiFE64NJs8iI+zZxp72esKHPXq/chJ1BvhHsXI0y1OBK8m8=
-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
Since we wish to generate RSASSA-PSS signatures even when hashes are
relatively large for the chosen RSA key size, we need some tests. Our
main focus will be on 1024-bit keys and the couple key sizes larger than
it. For example, we test for a signature generated using a salt length
of 63 when a 1032-bit key is used. Other tests check the boundary
conditions around other key sizes. We want to make sure we don't use a
salt length larger than the hash length (because FIPS 186-4 requires
this). We also want to make sure we don't use a salt that is too small
(no smaller than 2 bytes away from the hash length).
Test RSASSA-PSS signatures with:
- 1024-bit key and SHA-512 (slen 62)
- 1032-bit key and SHA-512 (slen 63)
- 1040-bit key and SHA-512 (slen 64)
- 1048-bit key and SHA-512 (slen 64)
The tests also verify that we can properly verify the RSASSA-PSS
signatures we've generated.
We've manually verified that OpenSSL 1.1.1-pre8 can verify the
RSASSA-PSS signatures we've generated.
$ openssl rsa -in rsa1024.pem -pubout -out pub1024.pem
writing RSA key
$ openssl rsa -in rsa1032.pem -pubout -out pub1032.pem
writing RSA key
$ openssl rsa -in rsa1040.pem -pubout -out pub1040.pem
writing RSA key
$ openssl rsa -in rsa1048.pem -pubout -out pub1048.pem
writing RSA key
$ cat message.bin | openssl dgst -sha512 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:62 -verify pub1024.pem -signature valid1024.bin
Verified OK
$ cat message.bin | openssl dgst -sha512 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:63 -verify pub1032.pem -signature valid1032.bin
Verified OK
$ cat message.bin | openssl dgst -sha512 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:64 -verify pub1040.pem -signature valid1040.bin
Verified OK
$ cat message.bin | openssl dgst -sha512 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:64 -verify pub1048.pem -signature valid1048.bin
Verified OK
We've also added a new test that ensures we can properly validate a
RSASSA-PSS 1032-bit signature with SHA-512 generated by OpenSSL. This
has been added as the "RSASSA-PSS Verify OpenSSL-generated Signature
1032-bit w/SHA-512" test. The signature to verify was generated with the
following command line.
$ cat message.bin | openssl dgst -sha512 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:63 -sign rsa1032.pem > valid.bin
The RSA private keys used by these tests were generated with OpenSSL
1.1.1-pre8.
$ openssl genrsa 1024
Generating RSA private key, 1024 bit long modulus (2 primes)
........................................++++++
......++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----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-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
$ openssl genrsa 1032
Generating RSA private key, 1032 bit long modulus (2 primes)
....................++++++
.................................++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----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-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
$ openssl genkey 1040
Generating RSA private key, 1040 bit long modulus
........++++++
........++++++
e is 65537 (0x10001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----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-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
$ openssl genrsa 1048
Generating RSA private key, 1048 bit long modulus (2 primes)
...............................++++++
.++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
MIICaQIBAAKBhADHXQ+foX0dJLk5U3pDQBfzkMZgRETDWhM2DWsfyYa69AFZuEJ1
03uIMnjfUGTdnrDymw0yWsx5DEtZZyc32786y4j14vLVTJGcr9ByJyxJRZHVLhWJ
kzFeceLKYLHHT+/489d4QrQV1OcXNKSYIGpc2TFch7I+WD4l60ypcFa0XJaFbQID
AQABAoGDSqKtUa6sXze7XBnDYN/i151wluOX9qaHIKo/W4Qfu2fUBZm0z9Wfnqp+
k+PODyX0yq5/b0WM3RhcMRksFn5fBgzYHEmAj8IHhDsjavNtiv8nIl6EF2PfuT1p
6iEpo8IS15dp6j5AKH4Zmnq6TRYiqdaz/ry/kpQrmeJym83KksujZWUCQg85t5gJ
UWvswuNIG2tHWEqiKZvSAnq4owO53lsK3LSl04447bjB+sPqHb1+HVC4QyPjYs/0
3z9aUYLa+pu5IXpz1wJCDRgWT4vQ1Y0BmZjIyxfEwDVOYripRirMowgWiU+YLCrh
FOc5k+MGmJMEN7TuxErewk0yzLy658xMn4kRseshAGhbAkIBClKPIuPbWfwfB4hI
FkHkJ5xsNzdQJ1mMIaEd22olNcd0ylMD8s0tocuSbRGXuF9uDlVsHDE85PD43fmN
tmKhOVUCQgG6H5c2VcEU7BUaNcGzzNudLE2RFaKPmpYWRwKtYODSdwWOyeVbmE8f
dPrz/lodlewCyqR+cBiKtcCFD7Rr0tp+6QJCALZlz954leZ6UKkdeOiTb+fVFpsq
DNNALCL4VJ7XcJJMpjgSKYv9sr1C43nifr1M4YDH+B3NFRF+FWdVodaseOKF
-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
It should be valid to RSASSA-PSS sign a SHA-512 hash with a 1024-bit or
1032-bit RSA key, but with the salt size being always equal to the hash
size, this isn't possible: the key is too small.
To enable use of hashes that are relatively large compared to the key
size, allow reducing the salt size to no less than the hash size minus 2
bytes. We don't allow salt sizes smaller than the hash size minus 2
bytes because that too significantly changes the security guarantees the
library provides compared to the previous implementation which always
used a salt size equal to the hash size. The new calculated salt size
remains compliant with FIPS 186-4.
We also need to update the "hash too large" test, since we now reduce
the salt size when certain key sizes are used. We used to not support
1024-bit keys with SHA-512, but now we support this by reducing the salt
size to 62. Update the "hash too large" test to use a 1016-bit RSA key
with SHA-512, which still has too large of a hash because we will not
reduce the salt size further than 2 bytes shorter than the hash size.
The RSA private key used for the test was generated using "openssl
genrsa 1016" using OpenSSL 1.1.1-pre8.
$ openssl genrsa 1016
Generating RSA private key, 1016 bit long modulus (2 primes)
..............++++++
....++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----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-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
Setting the dh_flag to 1 used to indicate that the caller requests safe
primes from mbedtls_mpi_gen_prime. We generalize the functionality to
make room for more flags in that parameter.
* development-restricted: (578 commits)
Update library version number to 2.13.1
Don't define _POSIX_C_SOURCE in header file
Don't declare and define gmtime()-mutex on Windows platforms
Correct preprocessor guards determining use of gmtime()
Correct documentation of mbedtls_platform_gmtime_r()
Correct typo in documentation of mbedtls_platform_gmtime_r()
Correct POSIX version check to determine presence of gmtime_r()
Improve documentation of mbedtls_platform_gmtime_r()
platform_utils.{c/h} -> platform_util.{c/h}
Don't include platform_time.h if !MBEDTLS_HAVE_TIME
Improve wording of documentation of MBEDTLS_PLATFORM_GMTIME_R_ALT
Fix typo in documentation of MBEDTLS_PLATFORM_GMTIME_R_ALT
Replace 'thread safe' by 'thread-safe' in the documentation
Improve documentation of MBEDTLS_HAVE_TIME_DATE
ChangeLog: Add missing renamings gmtime -> gmtime_r
Improve documentation of MBEDTLS_HAVE_TIME_DATE
Minor documentation improvements
Style: Add missing period in documentation in threading.h
Rename mbedtls_platform_gmtime() to mbedtls_platform_gmtime_r()
Guard decl and use of gmtime mutex by HAVE_TIME_DATE and !GMTIME_ALT
...
previously a single function was used for most test cases (ctr_drbg_validate) making it harder to understand what the exact scenario is as a result it was split into easier to understand functions.
the testing functions were re-factored so that the common code was extracted to a single static function (removing the need for unclear goto statements).
As part of the re-factor the test functions now use data_t for parameters (support for this was introduced in previous rebase),
