Changes run-test-suites.pl to filter out directories, and select only files
as on OSX, test coverage tests create .dSYM directories which were being
accidentally selected to execute.
We don't need to disable ASLR, so don't try. If gdb tries but fails,
the test runs normally, but all.sh then trips up because it sees
`warning: Error disabling address space randomization: Operation not permitted`
and interprets it as an error that indicates a test failure.
Generate the documentation from include and doxygen/input only. Don't
get snared by files containing Doxygen comments that lie in other
directories such as tests, yotta, crypto/include, ...
The only difference this makes in a fresh checkout is that the
documentation no longer lists target_config.h. This file is from
yotta, does not contain any Doxygen comment, and its inclusion in the
rendered documentation was clearly an oversight.
Add signing tests with 528-bit and 520-bit RSA keys with SHA-512. These
selections of key and hash size should lead to an error returned, as
there is not enough room for our chosen minimum salt size of two bytes
less than the hash size. These test the boundary around an available
salt length of 0 or -1 bytes.
The RSA keys were generated with OpenSSL 1.1.1-pre8.
$ openssl genrsa 520
Generating RSA private key, 520 bit long modulus (2 primes)
.............++++++++++++
.................++++++++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
MIIBPwIBAAJCANWgb4bludh0KFQBZcqWb6iJOmLipZ0L/XYXeAuwOfkWWjc6jhGd
B2b43lVnEPM/ZwGRU7rYIjd155fUUdSCBvO/AgMBAAECQgDOMq+zy6XZEjWi8D5q
j05zpRGgRRiKP/qEtB6BWbZ7gUV9DDgZhD4FFsqfanwjWNG52LkM9D1OQmUOtGGq
a9COwQIhD+6l9iIPrCkblQjsK6jtKB6zmu5NXcaTJUEGgW68cA7PAiENaJGHhcOq
/jHqqi2NgVbc5kWUD/dzSkVzN6Ub0AvIiBECIQIeL2Gw1XSFYm1Fal/DbQNQUX/e
/dnhc94X7s118wbScQIhAMPVgbDc//VurZ+155vYc9PjZlYe3QIAwlkLX3HYKkGx
AiEND8ndKyhkc8jLGlh8aRP8r03zpDIiZNKqCKiijMWVRYQ=
-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
$ openssl genrsa 528
Generating RSA private key, 528 bit long modulus (2 primes)
.........++++++++++++
....++++++++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
MIIBQgIBAAJDAKJVTrpxW/ZuXs3z1tcY4+XZB+hmbnv1p2tBUQbgTrgn7EyyGZz/
ZkkdRUGQggWapbVLDPXu9EQ0AvMEfAsObwJQgQIDAQABAkJhHVXvFjglElxnK7Rg
lERq0k73yqfYQts4wCegTHrrkv3HzqWQVVi29mGLSXTqoQ45gzWZ5Ru5NKjkTjko
YtWWIVECIgDScqoo7SCFrG3zwFxnGe7V3rYYr6LkykpvczC0MK1IZy0CIgDFeINr
qycUXbndZvF0cLYtSmEA+MoN7fRX7jY5w7lZYyUCIUxyiOurEDhe5eY5B5gQbJlW
ePHIw7S244lO3+9lC12U1QIhWgzQ8YKFObZcEejl5xGXIiQvBEBv89Y1fPu2YrUs
iuS5AiFE64NJs8iI+zZxp72esKHPXq/chJ1BvhHsXI0y1OBK8m8=
-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
Since we wish to generate RSASSA-PSS signatures even when hashes are
relatively large for the chosen RSA key size, we need some tests. Our
main focus will be on 1024-bit keys and the couple key sizes larger than
it. For example, we test for a signature generated using a salt length
of 63 when a 1032-bit key is used. Other tests check the boundary
conditions around other key sizes. We want to make sure we don't use a
salt length larger than the hash length (because FIPS 186-4 requires
this). We also want to make sure we don't use a salt that is too small
(no smaller than 2 bytes away from the hash length).
Test RSASSA-PSS signatures with:
- 1024-bit key and SHA-512 (slen 62)
- 1032-bit key and SHA-512 (slen 63)
- 1040-bit key and SHA-512 (slen 64)
- 1048-bit key and SHA-512 (slen 64)
The tests also verify that we can properly verify the RSASSA-PSS
signatures we've generated.
We've manually verified that OpenSSL 1.1.1-pre8 can verify the
RSASSA-PSS signatures we've generated.
$ openssl rsa -in rsa1024.pem -pubout -out pub1024.pem
writing RSA key
$ openssl rsa -in rsa1032.pem -pubout -out pub1032.pem
writing RSA key
$ openssl rsa -in rsa1040.pem -pubout -out pub1040.pem
writing RSA key
$ openssl rsa -in rsa1048.pem -pubout -out pub1048.pem
writing RSA key
$ cat message.bin | openssl dgst -sha512 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:62 -verify pub1024.pem -signature valid1024.bin
Verified OK
$ cat message.bin | openssl dgst -sha512 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:63 -verify pub1032.pem -signature valid1032.bin
Verified OK
$ cat message.bin | openssl dgst -sha512 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:64 -verify pub1040.pem -signature valid1040.bin
Verified OK
$ cat message.bin | openssl dgst -sha512 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:64 -verify pub1048.pem -signature valid1048.bin
Verified OK
We've also added a new test that ensures we can properly validate a
RSASSA-PSS 1032-bit signature with SHA-512 generated by OpenSSL. This
has been added as the "RSASSA-PSS Verify OpenSSL-generated Signature
1032-bit w/SHA-512" test. The signature to verify was generated with the
following command line.
$ cat message.bin | openssl dgst -sha512 -sigopt rsa_padding_mode:pss -sigopt rsa_pss_saltlen:63 -sign rsa1032.pem > valid.bin
The RSA private keys used by these tests were generated with OpenSSL
1.1.1-pre8.
$ openssl genrsa 1024
Generating RSA private key, 1024 bit long modulus (2 primes)
........................................++++++
......++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----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-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
$ openssl genrsa 1032
Generating RSA private key, 1032 bit long modulus (2 primes)
....................++++++
.................................++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----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-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
$ openssl genkey 1040
Generating RSA private key, 1040 bit long modulus
........++++++
........++++++
e is 65537 (0x10001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----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-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
$ openssl genrsa 1048
Generating RSA private key, 1048 bit long modulus (2 primes)
...............................++++++
.++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----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-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
It should be valid to RSASSA-PSS sign a SHA-512 hash with a 1024-bit or
1032-bit RSA key, but with the salt size being always equal to the hash
size, this isn't possible: the key is too small.
To enable use of hashes that are relatively large compared to the key
size, allow reducing the salt size to no less than the hash size minus 2
bytes. We don't allow salt sizes smaller than the hash size minus 2
bytes because that too significantly changes the security guarantees the
library provides compared to the previous implementation which always
used a salt size equal to the hash size. The new calculated salt size
remains compliant with FIPS 186-4.
We also need to update the "hash too large" test, since we now reduce
the salt size when certain key sizes are used. We used to not support
1024-bit keys with SHA-512, but now we support this by reducing the salt
size to 62. Update the "hash too large" test to use a 1016-bit RSA key
with SHA-512, which still has too large of a hash because we will not
reduce the salt size further than 2 bytes shorter than the hash size.
The RSA private key used for the test was generated using "openssl
genrsa 1016" using OpenSSL 1.1.1-pre8.
$ openssl genrsa 1016
Generating RSA private key, 1016 bit long modulus (2 primes)
..............++++++
....++++++
e is 65537 (0x010001)
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----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-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
We don't need to disable ASLR, so don't try. If gdb tries but fails,
the test runs normally, but all.sh then trips up because it sees
`warning: Error disabling address space randomization: Operation not permitted`
and interprets it as an error that indicates a test failure.
Even with a shallow clone of the repo where there are no tags available
to version with, don't error and instead show a unique abbreviated
commit hash as fallback.
Generate the documentation from include and doxygen/input only. Don't
get snared by files containing Doxygen comments that lie in other
directories such as tests, yotta, crypto/include, ...
The only difference this makes in a fresh checkout is that the
documentation no longer lists target_config.h. This file is from
yotta, does not contain any Doxygen comment, and its inclusion in the
rendered documentation was clearly an oversight.
This commit fixes some missing size comparison. In
aead_encrypt_decrypt, aead_encrypt and aead_decrypt, the test code
would not have noticed if the library function had reported an output
length that was not the expected length.
ASSERT_COMPARE tests that the two buffers have the same size and
content. The intended use is to replace TEST_ASSERT( size1 == size2 )
followed by memcmp on the content. Keep using memcmp when comparing
two buffers that have the same size by construction.
This commit resolves a bug whereby some test cases failed on systems
where mbedtls_calloc returns NULL when the size of 0, because the test
case asserted `pointer != NULL` regardless of the size.
The new macro ASSERT_ALLOC allocates memory with mbedtls_calloc and
fails the test if the allocation fails. It outputs a null pointer if
the requested size is 0. It is meant to replace existing calls to
mbedtls_calloc.
Yotta is no longer supported by Mbed TLS, so has been removed. Specifically, the
following changes have been made:
* references to yotta have been removed from the main readme and build
instructions
* the yotta module directory and build script has been removed
* yotta has been removed from test scripts such as all.sh and check-names.sh
* yotta has been removed from other files that that referenced it such as the
doxyfile and the bn_mul.h header
* yotta specific configurations and references have been removed from config.h
Setting the dh_flag to 1 used to indicate that the caller requests safe
primes from mbedtls_mpi_gen_prime. We generalize the functionality to
make room for more flags in that parameter.
If some algorithms are excluded in the build, it's ok for the corresponding
macros not to give the correct results. Therefore the corresponding test cases
should depend on the implementation of the algorithm. For example, it's ok for
PSA_HASH_MAX_SIZE to be less than PSA_HASH_SIZE(PSA_ALG_SHA_512) if we build
without SHA-512 support, and we indeed do this. It's even ok for an
implementation to return 0 for PSA_ALG_IS_HASH(PSA_ALG_SHA_512) if it doesn't
support SHA-512; we return 1 anyway but the tests are less
implementation-specific if we don't enforce it.
This commit adds dependencies on symbols that don't exist in Mbed TLS,
for algorithms that Mbed TLS doesn't implement. These are:
MBEDTLS_SHA512_256 for SHA-512/256, MBEDTLS_SHA3_C for SHA-3,
MBEDTLS_DSA_C and MBEDTLS_DSA_DETERMINISTIC for DSA, and
MBEDTLS_ECP_DP_xxx_ENABLED for elliptic curves that have a PSA
encoding but are not supported in Mbed TLS.
For all key types, validate feature test macros (PSA_KEY_TYPE_IS_xxx).
For asymmetric keys (public key or key pair), validate the
corresponding public/pair type.
For ECC keys, validate GET_CURVE.
For all algorithms, validate feature test macros (PSA_ALG_IS_xxx).
For hash algorithms, validate the exact hash size, and validate
xxx_GET_HASH macros on dependent algorithms.
For MAC algorithms, validate the MAC size. For AEAD algorithms,
validate the tag size.
There is a separate test case for each HMAC algorithm, which is
necessary because each has its own MAC size. For other hash-dependent
algorithms, there is no interesting variation to test here, so only
one hash gets tested.
None of the currently defined MAC algorithms have a MAC size that
depends on the key size, so the key_bits parameter is unused. The
key_type parameter may be unused on an implementation where there is
no block cipher MAC. Declare the key_type and key_bits parameters as
used so that callers who define a variable just for this don't risk
getting "unused variable" warnings.
The macro was used under the name PSA_ALG_IS_BLOCK_CIPHER_MAC but
defined as PSA_ALG_IS_CIPHER_MAC. That wouldn't have worked if we used
this macro (we currently don't but it may become useful).
TLS now defines named curves in the "TLS Supported Groups registry",
but we're using the encoding only for elliptic curves, so don't
include values that aren't named curve.
While we're at it, upgrade the reference to the shiny new RFC 8422.
OFB and CFB are streaming modes. XTS is a not a cipher mode but it
doesn't use a separate padding step. This leaves only CBC as a block
cipher mode that needs a padding step.
Since CBC is the only mode that uses a separate padding step, and is
likely to remain the only mode in the future, encode the padding mode
directly in the algorithm constant, rather than building up an
algorithm value from a chaining mode and a padding mode. This greatly
simplifies the interface as well as some parts of the implementation.
Mbed TLS distinguishes "invalid padding" from "valid padding but the
rest of the signature is invalid". This has little use in practice and
PSA doesn't report this distinction. We just report "invalid
signature".
