Try making one condition more readable
No semantic change intended. Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f0c28eff09
commit
e88511d7fe
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -3365,10 +3365,10 @@ psa_status_t psa_key_derivation_input_integer(
|
|||
* \note Once all inputs steps are completed, the operations will allow:
|
||||
* - psa_key_derivation_output_bytes() if each input was either a direct input
|
||||
* or a key with #PSA_KEY_USAGE_DERIVE set;
|
||||
* - psa_key_derivation_output_key() if each input was either a direct input
|
||||
* or a key with #PSA_KEY_USAGE_DERIVE set and input for step
|
||||
* - psa_key_derivation_output_key() if the input for step
|
||||
* #PSA_KEY_DERIVATION_INPUT_SECRET or #PSA_KEY_DERIVATION_INPUT_PASSWORD
|
||||
* was from a key slot;
|
||||
* was from a key slot with #PSA_KEY_USAGE_DERIVE and each other input was
|
||||
* either a direct input or a key with #PSA_KEY_USAGE_DERIVE set;
|
||||
* - psa_key_derivation_verify_bytes() if each input was either a direct input
|
||||
* or a key with #PSA_KEY_USAGE_VERIFY_DERIVATION set;
|
||||
* - psa_key_derivation_verify_key() if each input was either a direct input
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue