improve aesni check for x86_64
`MBEDTLS_AESNI_C` does not depends on `MBEDTLS_HAVE_ASM` when intrinsic is available. And compiler relative checks only work on x86_64, it should be only checked on x86_64. Signed-off-by: Jerry Yu <jerry.h.yu@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
13696bb07b
commit
8189f32945
2 changed files with 8 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -40,8 +40,7 @@
|
|||
#endif
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(MBEDTLS_HAVE_ASM) && \
|
||||
(defined(__amd64__) || defined(__x86_64__))
|
||||
#if defined(__amd64__) || defined(__x86_64__)
|
||||
#if !defined(MBEDTLS_AESNI_C) && defined(MBEDTLS_AES_USE_HARDWARE_ONLY)
|
||||
#error "MBEDTLS_AES_USE_HARDWARE_ONLY defined, but not all prerequisites"
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -35,13 +35,13 @@
|
|||
/* Can we do AESNI with inline assembly?
|
||||
* (Only implemented with gas syntax, only for 64-bit.)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#if defined(MBEDTLS_HAVE_ASM) && defined(__GNUC__) && \
|
||||
(defined(__amd64__) || defined(__x86_64__)) && \
|
||||
!defined(MBEDTLS_HAVE_X86_64)
|
||||
#if !defined(MBEDTLS_HAVE_X86_64) && \
|
||||
(defined(__amd64__) || defined(__x86_64__) || \
|
||||
defined(_M_X64) || defined(_M_AMD64))
|
||||
#define MBEDTLS_HAVE_X86_64
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(MBEDTLS_AESNI_C)
|
||||
#if defined(MBEDTLS_AESNI_C) && defined(MBEDTLS_HAVE_X86_64)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Can we do AESNI with intrinsics?
|
||||
* (Only implemented with certain compilers, only for certain targets.)
|
||||
|
@ -67,8 +67,10 @@
|
|||
* In the long run, we will likely remove the assembly implementation. */
|
||||
#if defined(MBEDTLS_AESNI_HAVE_INTRINSICS)
|
||||
#define MBEDTLS_AESNI_HAVE_CODE 2 // via intrinsics
|
||||
#elif defined(MBEDTLS_HAVE_X86_64)
|
||||
#elif defined(MBEDTLS_HAVE_ASM)
|
||||
#define MBEDTLS_AESNI_HAVE_CODE 1 // via assembly
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#error "MBEDTLS_AESNI_C defined, but neither intrinsics nor assembly available"
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(MBEDTLS_AESNI_HAVE_CODE)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue