Fix a few more typos
Update link while at it. Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
de9ffe37ab
commit
68429fc44d
3 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions
|
@ -15,9 +15,9 @@
|
||||||
# justified, and a github issue is created to track it.
|
# justified, and a github issue is created to track it.
|
||||||
#
|
#
|
||||||
# WARNING: this script checks out a commit other than the head of the current
|
# WARNING: this script checks out a commit other than the head of the current
|
||||||
# branch; it checks out the current branch again when running sucessfully,
|
# branch; it checks out the current branch again when running successfully,
|
||||||
# but while the script is running, or if it terminates early in error, you
|
# but while the script is running, or if it terminates early in error, you
|
||||||
# should be aware that yu might be at a different commit than expected.
|
# should be aware that you might be at a different commit than expected.
|
||||||
#
|
#
|
||||||
# NOTE: This is only an example/template script, you should make a copy and
|
# NOTE: This is only an example/template script, you should make a copy and
|
||||||
# edit it to suit your needs. The part that needs editing is at the top.
|
# edit it to suit your needs. The part that needs editing is at the top.
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -294,12 +294,12 @@ available, and "falling back" to PSA only if it's not. The compile-time
|
||||||
dependency changes from the current one (say, `MD_C` or `AES_C`) to "the
|
dependency changes from the current one (say, `MD_C` or `AES_C`) to "the
|
||||||
previous dependency OR PSA Crypto with needed algorithms". When building
|
previous dependency OR PSA Crypto with needed algorithms". When building
|
||||||
without software implementation, users need to call `psa_crypto_init()` before
|
without software implementation, users need to call `psa_crypto_init()` before
|
||||||
calling any function from these modules. This condition does constitute a
|
calling any function from these modules. This condition does not constitute a
|
||||||
break of backwards compability, as it was previously impossible to build in
|
break of backwards compatibility, as it was previously impossible to build in
|
||||||
those configurations, and in configurations were the build was possible,
|
those configurations, and in configurations were the build was possible,
|
||||||
application code keeps working unchanged. An incomplete example of applying
|
application code keeps working unchanged. An work-in-progress example of
|
||||||
this strategy, for RSA PKCS#1 v2.1, is here:
|
applying this strategy, for RSA PKCS#1 v2.1, is here:
|
||||||
<https://github.com/mpg/mbedtls/pull/4>.
|
<https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/pull/6141>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
There is a problem with the modules used for the PSA RNG, as currently the RNG
|
There is a problem with the modules used for the PSA RNG, as currently the RNG
|
||||||
is initialized before drivers and the key store. This part will need further
|
is initialized before drivers and the key store. This part will need further
|
||||||
|
@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ It should be noted that there are currently:
|
||||||
`MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_CONFIG`, `mbedtls_config.h` + `psa/crypto_config.h`).
|
`MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_CONFIG`, `mbedtls_config.h` + `psa/crypto_config.h`).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As a result, we need more families of dependency macros than we'd like to.
|
As a result, we need more families of dependency macros than we'd like to.
|
||||||
This is a temporary situation until we move to a place where everthing is
|
This is a temporary situation until we move to a place where everything is
|
||||||
based on PSA Crypto. In the meantime, long and explicit names where chosen for
|
based on PSA Crypto. In the meantime, long and explicit names where chosen for
|
||||||
the new macros in the hope of avoiding confusion.
|
the new macros in the hope of avoiding confusion.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
|
||||||
* - feature is expressed the same way as in PSA_WANT macros, for example:
|
* - feature is expressed the same way as in PSA_WANT macros, for example:
|
||||||
* KEY_TYPE_AES, ALG_SHA_256, ECC_SECP_R1_256;
|
* KEY_TYPE_AES, ALG_SHA_256, ECC_SECP_R1_256;
|
||||||
* - legacy is either LOWLEVEL or the name of the layer: MD, CIPHER;
|
* - legacy is either LOWLEVEL or the name of the layer: MD, CIPHER;
|
||||||
* - condition is ommitted if it's based on availability, else it's
|
* - condition is omitted if it's based on availability, else it's
|
||||||
* BASED_ON_USE_PSA.
|
* BASED_ON_USE_PSA.
|
||||||
*
|
*
|
||||||
* Coming back to the examples above:
|
* Coming back to the examples above:
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue