Improve docs for zeroize.c and test_zeroize.gdb
This commit is contained in:
parent
1e8ea5fa68
commit
42defd10a6
2 changed files with 36 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -1,5 +1,14 @@
|
|||
/*
|
||||
* Zeroize demonstration program
|
||||
* Zeroize application for debugger-driven testing
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This is a simple test application used for debbuger-driven testing to check
|
||||
* whether calls to mbedtls_zeroize() are being eliminated by compiler
|
||||
* optimizations. This application is used by the GDB script at
|
||||
* tests/scripts/test_zeroize.gdb under the assumption that line numbers do not
|
||||
* change often (as opposed to the library code) because the script sets a
|
||||
* breakpoint at the last return statement in the main() function of this
|
||||
* program. The debugger facilities are then used to manually inspect the
|
||||
* memory and verify that the call to mbedtls_zeroize() was not eliminated.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Copyright (C) 2017, ARM Limited, All Rights Reserved
|
||||
* SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -13,11 +13,36 @@
|
|||
# debugger manually checks the contents to be zeroized and checks that it is
|
||||
# actually cleared.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# The mbedtls_zeroize() test is debugger driven because there does not seem to
|
||||
# be a mechanism to reliably check whether the zeroize calls are being
|
||||
# eliminated by compiler optimizations from within the compiled program. The
|
||||
# problem is that a compiler would typically remove what it considers to be
|
||||
# "unecessary" assignments as part of redundant code elimination. To identify
|
||||
# such code, the compilar will create some form dependency graph between
|
||||
# reads and writes to variables (among other situations). It will then use this
|
||||
# data structure to remove redundant code that does not have an impact on the
|
||||
# program's observable behavior. In the case of mbedtls_zeroize(), an
|
||||
# intelligent compiler could determine that this function clears a block of
|
||||
# memory that is not accessed later in the program, so removing the call to
|
||||
# mbedtls_zeroize() does not have an observable behavior. However, inserting a
|
||||
# test after a call to mbedtls_zeroize() to check whether the block of
|
||||
# memory was correctly zeroed would force the compiler to not eliminate the
|
||||
# mbedtls_zeroize() call. If this does not occur, then the compiler potentially
|
||||
# has a bug.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Note: This test requires that the test program is compiled with -g3.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# WARNING: There does not seem to be a mechanism in GDB scripts to set a
|
||||
# breakpoint at the end of a function (probably because there are a lot of
|
||||
# complications as function can have multiple exit points, etc). Therefore, it
|
||||
# was necessary to hard-code the line number of the breakpoint in the zeroize.c
|
||||
# test app. The assumption is that zeroize.c is a simple test app that does not
|
||||
# change often (as opposed to the actual library code), so the breakpoint line
|
||||
# number does not need to be updated often.
|
||||
|
||||
set confirm off
|
||||
file ./programs/test/zeroize
|
||||
break zeroize.c:90
|
||||
break zeroize.c:99
|
||||
|
||||
set args ./programs/test/zeroize.c
|
||||
run
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue