Avoid duplicate program names
Visual Studio and CMake didn't like having targets with the same name, albeit in different directories. Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6fdc9e8df1
commit
29088a4146
8 changed files with 17 additions and 17 deletions
4
programs/.gitignore
vendored
4
programs/.gitignore
vendored
|
@ -13,10 +13,10 @@
|
|||
*.exe
|
||||
|
||||
aes/crypt_and_hash
|
||||
cipher/aead_demo
|
||||
cipher/cipher_aead_demo
|
||||
hash/generic_sum
|
||||
hash/hello
|
||||
hash/hmac_demo
|
||||
hash/md_hmac_demo
|
||||
hash/md5sum
|
||||
hash/sha1sum
|
||||
hash/sha2sum
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ endif
|
|||
## make sure to check that it still works if you tweak the format here.
|
||||
APPS = \
|
||||
aes/crypt_and_hash \
|
||||
cipher/aead_demo \
|
||||
cipher/cipher_aead_demo \
|
||||
hash/generic_sum \
|
||||
hash/hello \
|
||||
hash/hmac_demo \
|
||||
hash/md_hmac_demo \
|
||||
pkey/dh_client \
|
||||
pkey/dh_genprime \
|
||||
pkey/dh_server \
|
||||
|
@ -177,9 +177,9 @@ aes/crypt_and_hash$(EXEXT): aes/crypt_and_hash.c $(DEP)
|
|||
echo " CC aes/crypt_and_hash.c"
|
||||
$(CC) $(LOCAL_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) aes/crypt_and_hash.c $(LOCAL_LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@
|
||||
|
||||
cipher/aead_demo$(EXEXT): cipher/aead_demo.c $(DEP)
|
||||
echo " CC cipher/aead_demo.c"
|
||||
$(CC) $(LOCAL_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) cipher/aead_demo.c $(LOCAL_LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@
|
||||
cipher/cipher_aead_demo$(EXEXT): cipher/cipher_aead_demo.c $(DEP)
|
||||
echo " CC cipher/cipher_aead_demo.c"
|
||||
$(CC) $(LOCAL_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) cipher/cipher_aead_demo.c $(LOCAL_LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@
|
||||
|
||||
hash/generic_sum$(EXEXT): hash/generic_sum.c $(DEP)
|
||||
echo " CC hash/generic_sum.c"
|
||||
|
@ -189,9 +189,9 @@ hash/hello$(EXEXT): hash/hello.c $(DEP)
|
|||
echo " CC hash/hello.c"
|
||||
$(CC) $(LOCAL_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) hash/hello.c $(LOCAL_LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@
|
||||
|
||||
hash/hmac_demo$(EXEXT): hash/hmac_demo.c $(DEP)
|
||||
echo " CC hash/hmac_demo.c"
|
||||
$(CC) $(LOCAL_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) hash/hmac_demo.c $(LOCAL_LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@
|
||||
hash/md_hmac_demo$(EXEXT): hash/md_hmac_demo.c $(DEP)
|
||||
echo " CC hash/md_hmac_demo.c"
|
||||
$(CC) $(LOCAL_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) hash/md_hmac_demo.c $(LOCAL_LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@
|
||||
|
||||
pkey/dh_client$(EXEXT): pkey/dh_client.c $(DEP)
|
||||
echo " CC pkey/dh_client.c"
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|||
set(executables
|
||||
aead_demo
|
||||
cipher_aead_demo
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
foreach(exe IN LISTS executables)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ int main( void )
|
|||
|
||||
/* The real program starts here. */
|
||||
|
||||
const char usage[] = "Usage: aead_demo [aes128-gcm|aes256-gcm|aes128-gcm_8|chachapoly]";
|
||||
const char usage[] = "Usage: cipher_aead_demo [aes128-gcm|aes256-gcm|aes128-gcm_8|chachapoly]";
|
||||
|
||||
/* Dummy data for encryption: IV/nonce, additional data, 2-part message */
|
||||
const unsigned char iv1[12] = { 0x00 };
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
set(executables
|
||||
generic_sum
|
||||
hello
|
||||
hmac_demo
|
||||
md_hmac_demo
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
foreach(exe IN LISTS executables)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
|
|||
* This program AEAD-encrypts a message, using the algorithm and key size
|
||||
* specified on the command line, using the multi-part API.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* It comes with a companion program cipher/aead_demo.c, which does the same
|
||||
* It comes with a companion program cipher/cipher_aead_demo.c, which does the same
|
||||
* operations with the legacy Cipher API. The goal is that comparing the two
|
||||
* programs will help people migrating to the PSA Crypto API.
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
|
|||
* On the other hand, with PSA, the algorithms encodes the desired tag length;
|
||||
* with Cipher the desired tag length needs to be tracked separately.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This program and its companion cipher/aead_demo.c illustrate this by doing the
|
||||
* This program and its companion cipher/cipher_aead_demo.c illustrate this by doing the
|
||||
* same sequence of multi-part AEAD computation with both APIs; looking at the
|
||||
* two side by side should make the differences and similarities clear.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
|
|||
*
|
||||
* This programs computes the HMAC of two messages using the multi-part API.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* It comes with a companion program hash/hmac_demo.c, which does the same
|
||||
* It comes with a companion program hash/md_hmac_demo.c, which does the same
|
||||
* operations with the legacy MD API. The goal is that comparing the two
|
||||
* programs will help people migrating to the PSA Crypto API.
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
|
|||
* objects: (1) a psa_key_id_t to hold the key, and (2) a psa_operation_t for
|
||||
* multi-part progress.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This program and its companion hash/hmac_demo.c illustrate this by doing the
|
||||
* This program and its companion hash/md_hmac_demo.c illustrate this by doing the
|
||||
* same sequence of multi-part HMAC computation with both APIs; looking at the
|
||||
* two side by side should make the differences and similarities clear.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue