Explain why we check 65535 (not USHORT_MAX)
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b8f18850c6
commit
24a305ec22
1 changed files with 6 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -224,6 +224,12 @@ typedef struct mbedtls_mpi {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/** Total number of limbs in \c p. */
|
/** Total number of limbs in \c p. */
|
||||||
unsigned short MBEDTLS_PRIVATE(n);
|
unsigned short MBEDTLS_PRIVATE(n);
|
||||||
|
/* Make sure that MBEDTLS_MPI_MAX_LIMBS fits in n.
|
||||||
|
* Use the same limit value on all platforms so that we don't have to
|
||||||
|
* think about different behavior on the rare platforms where
|
||||||
|
* unsigned short can store values larger than the minimum required by
|
||||||
|
* the C language, which is 65535.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
#if MBEDTLS_MPI_MAX_LIMBS > 65535
|
#if MBEDTLS_MPI_MAX_LIMBS > 65535
|
||||||
#error "MBEDTLS_MPI_MAX_LIMBS > 65535 is not supported"
|
#error "MBEDTLS_MPI_MAX_LIMBS > 65535 is not supported"
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue