dyncom: Remove an unnecessary variable in the interpreter
All this was doing was needlessly aliasing a variable.
This commit is contained in:
parent
4560178f66
commit
31dc8b8890
1 changed files with 17 additions and 19 deletions
|
@ -3672,7 +3672,7 @@ static int clz(unsigned int x) {
|
||||||
return n;
|
return n;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
unsigned InterpreterMainLoop(ARMul_State* state) {
|
unsigned InterpreterMainLoop(ARMul_State* cpu) {
|
||||||
Common::Profiling::ScopeTimer timer_execute(profile_execute);
|
Common::Profiling::ScopeTimer timer_execute(profile_execute);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#undef RM
|
#undef RM
|
||||||
|
@ -3930,8 +3930,6 @@ unsigned InterpreterMainLoop(ARMul_State* state) {
|
||||||
#define PC (cpu->Reg[15])
|
#define PC (cpu->Reg[15])
|
||||||
#define CHECK_EXT_INT if (!cpu->NirqSig && !(cpu->Cpsr & 0x80)) goto END;
|
#define CHECK_EXT_INT if (!cpu->NirqSig && !(cpu->Cpsr & 0x80)) goto END;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ARMul_State* cpu = state;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// GCC and Clang have a C++ extension to support a lookup table of labels. Otherwise, fallback
|
// GCC and Clang have a C++ extension to support a lookup table of labels. Otherwise, fallback
|
||||||
// to a clunky switch statement.
|
// to a clunky switch statement.
|
||||||
#if defined __GNUC__ || defined __clang__
|
#if defined __GNUC__ || defined __clang__
|
||||||
|
@ -6492,24 +6490,24 @@ unsigned InterpreterMainLoop(ARMul_State* state) {
|
||||||
s16 sum4 = ((rn_val >> 24) & 0xFF) + ((rm_val >> 24) & 0xFF);
|
s16 sum4 = ((rn_val >> 24) & 0xFF) + ((rm_val >> 24) & 0xFF);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (sum1 >= 0x100)
|
if (sum1 >= 0x100)
|
||||||
state->Cpsr |= (1 << 16);
|
cpu->Cpsr |= (1 << 16);
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
state->Cpsr &= ~(1 << 16);
|
cpu->Cpsr &= ~(1 << 16);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (sum2 >= 0x100)
|
if (sum2 >= 0x100)
|
||||||
state->Cpsr |= (1 << 17);
|
cpu->Cpsr |= (1 << 17);
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
state->Cpsr &= ~(1 << 17);
|
cpu->Cpsr &= ~(1 << 17);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (sum3 >= 0x100)
|
if (sum3 >= 0x100)
|
||||||
state->Cpsr |= (1 << 18);
|
cpu->Cpsr |= (1 << 18);
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
state->Cpsr &= ~(1 << 18);
|
cpu->Cpsr &= ~(1 << 18);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (sum4 >= 0x100)
|
if (sum4 >= 0x100)
|
||||||
state->Cpsr |= (1 << 19);
|
cpu->Cpsr |= (1 << 19);
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
state->Cpsr &= ~(1 << 19);
|
cpu->Cpsr &= ~(1 << 19);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
lo_result = ((sum1 & 0xFF) | (sum2 & 0xFF) << 8);
|
lo_result = ((sum1 & 0xFF) | (sum2 & 0xFF) << 8);
|
||||||
hi_result = ((sum3 & 0xFF) | (sum4 & 0xFF) << 8);
|
hi_result = ((sum3 & 0xFF) | (sum4 & 0xFF) << 8);
|
||||||
|
@ -6522,24 +6520,24 @@ unsigned InterpreterMainLoop(ARMul_State* state) {
|
||||||
s16 diff4 = ((rn_val >> 24) & 0xFF) - ((rm_val >> 24) & 0xFF);
|
s16 diff4 = ((rn_val >> 24) & 0xFF) - ((rm_val >> 24) & 0xFF);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (diff1 >= 0)
|
if (diff1 >= 0)
|
||||||
state->Cpsr |= (1 << 16);
|
cpu->Cpsr |= (1 << 16);
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
state->Cpsr &= ~(1 << 16);
|
cpu->Cpsr &= ~(1 << 16);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (diff2 >= 0)
|
if (diff2 >= 0)
|
||||||
state->Cpsr |= (1 << 17);
|
cpu->Cpsr |= (1 << 17);
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
state->Cpsr &= ~(1 << 17);
|
cpu->Cpsr &= ~(1 << 17);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (diff3 >= 0)
|
if (diff3 >= 0)
|
||||||
state->Cpsr |= (1 << 18);
|
cpu->Cpsr |= (1 << 18);
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
state->Cpsr &= ~(1 << 18);
|
cpu->Cpsr &= ~(1 << 18);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (diff4 >= 0)
|
if (diff4 >= 0)
|
||||||
state->Cpsr |= (1 << 19);
|
cpu->Cpsr |= (1 << 19);
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
state->Cpsr &= ~(1 << 19);
|
cpu->Cpsr &= ~(1 << 19);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
lo_result = (diff1 & 0xFF) | ((diff2 & 0xFF) << 8);
|
lo_result = (diff1 & 0xFF) | ((diff2 & 0xFF) << 8);
|
||||||
hi_result = (diff3 & 0xFF) | ((diff4 & 0xFF) << 8);
|
hi_result = (diff3 & 0xFF) | ((diff4 & 0xFF) << 8);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue