1
0
Fork 0
forked from suyu/suyu
Commit graph

19 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Lioncash
0258b444ef service/vi: Replace includes with forward declarations where applicable 2018-09-13 16:55:47 -04:00
Lioncash
6ac955a0b4 hle/service: Default constructors and destructors in the cpp file where applicable
When a destructor isn't defaulted into a cpp file, it can cause the use
of forward declarations to seemingly fail to compile for non-obvious
reasons. It also allows inlining of the construction/destruction logic
all over the place where a constructor or destructor is invoked, which
can lead to code bloat. This isn't so much a worry here, given the
services won't be created and destroyed frequently.

The cause of the above mentioned non-obvious errors can be demonstrated
as follows:

------- Demonstrative example, if you know how the described error happens, skip forwards -------

Assume we have the following in the header, which we'll call "thing.h":

\#include <memory>

// Forward declaration. For example purposes, assume the definition
// of Object is in some header named "object.h"
class Object;

class Thing {
public:
    // assume no constructors or destructors are specified here,
    // or the constructors/destructors are defined as:
    //
    // Thing() = default;
    // ~Thing() = default;
    //

    // ... Some interface member functions would be defined here

private:
    std::shared_ptr<Object> obj;
};

If this header is included in a cpp file, (which we'll call "main.cpp"),
this will result in a compilation error, because even though no
destructor is specified, the destructor will still need to be generated by
the compiler because std::shared_ptr's destructor is *not* trivial (in
other words, it does something other than nothing), as std::shared_ptr's
destructor needs to do two things:

1. Decrement the shared reference count of the object being pointed to,
   and if the reference count decrements to zero,

2. Free the Object instance's memory (aka deallocate the memory it's
   pointing to).

And so the compiler generates the code for the destructor doing this inside main.cpp.

Now, keep in mind, the Object forward declaration is not a complete type. All it
does is tell the compiler "a type named Object exists" and allows us to
use the name in certain situations to avoid a header dependency. So the
compiler needs to generate destruction code for Object, but the compiler
doesn't know *how* to destruct it. A forward declaration doesn't tell
the compiler anything about Object's constructor or destructor. So, the
compiler will issue an error in this case because it's undefined
behavior to try and deallocate (or construct) an incomplete type and
std::shared_ptr and std::unique_ptr make sure this isn't the case
internally.

Now, if we had defaulted the destructor in "thing.cpp", where we also
include "object.h", this would never be an issue, as the destructor
would only have its code generated in one place, and it would be in a
place where the full class definition of Object would be visible to the
compiler.

---------------------- End example ----------------------------

Given these service classes are more than certainly going to change in
the future, this defaults the constructors and destructors into the
relevant cpp files to make the construction and destruction of all of
the services consistent and unlikely to run into cases where forward
declarations are indirectly causing compilation errors. It also has the
plus of avoiding the need to rebuild several services if destruction
logic changes, since it would only be necessary to recompile the single
cpp file.
2018-09-10 23:55:31 -04:00
Lioncash
c061c2bf3c hle/service: Make constructors explicit where applicable
Prevents implicit construction and makes these lingering non-explicit
constructors consistent with the rest of the other classes in services.
2018-07-19 12:25:02 -04:00
Lioncash
ccca5e7c28 service: Use nested namespace specifiers where applicable
Tidies up namespace declarations
2018-04-19 22:20:28 -04:00
bunnei
9d08a11c1d vi: Implement GetDisplayResolution. 2018-04-02 23:50:59 -04:00
mailwl
6673ed1274 Service/vi: convert services to module 2018-03-21 13:09:40 +03:00
mailwl
335096e19a Service: stub some functions in am, audio, time, vi services 2018-02-07 15:11:17 +03:00
Subv
42859461f3 Services: Vi shouldn't be responsible for creating nvflinger.
It is now created during Service initialization and passed to all the services that need it.
2018-01-22 13:40:02 -05:00
Subv
8d7686ff8e VI: Move BufferQueue and NVFlinger to their own folder/namespace. 2018-01-22 11:54:58 -05:00
Subv
749043c809 VI: Implement the Query transaction of IHOSBinderDriver, and stubbed some results. 2018-01-21 11:13:47 -05:00
Subv
f827b17dd4 VI: Stubbed GetNativeHandle, Create/DestroyStrayLayer and CloseDisplay 2018-01-16 19:01:03 -05:00
bunnei
1247c53786 yuzu: Update license text to be consistent across project. 2018-01-13 16:22:39 -05:00
bunnei
7e0ff43da0 vi: Use new CoreTiming::EventType 2018-01-10 23:28:33 -05:00
Subv
34ae2ec644 NV: Expose the nvdisp_disp0 device and a weak reference to the nvdrv:a service.
NVFlinger will call into the nvdisp_disp0 device to perform screen flips, bypassing the ioctl interface.

We now have the address of the framebuffer to draw, we just need to actually put it on the screen.
2018-01-10 23:28:29 -05:00
Subv
e21fbd9ae5 NV: Determine what buffer to draw for each layer of each display.
Don't try to draw buffers that the guest application is using, only queued buffers are eligible for drawing.

Drawing actual pixels is still not implemented.
2018-01-10 23:28:25 -05:00
Subv
404149e475 NV: Signal all display's vsync event 60 times per second. 2018-01-10 23:28:22 -05:00
Subv
d205dee0a6 NV: Give each display its own vsync event. 2018-01-10 23:28:19 -05:00
Subv
927569bed8 NV: Keep track of Displays, Layers and BufferQueues in nvflinger. 2018-01-10 23:28:16 -05:00
Subv
25f29c2f4f NV: Implemented (with stubs) the vi:m service and some of its subservices.
The homebrew display test application now properly writes graphics data to the graphics buffer but we still don't have a way to compose the display layers.
2018-01-10 23:28:09 -05:00