There's no real need to use a shared pointer in these cases, and only
makes object management more fragile in terms of how easy it would be to
introduce cycles. Instead, just do the simple thing of using a regular
pointer. Much of this is just a hold-over from citra anyways.
It also doesn't make sense from a behavioral point of view for a
process' thread to prolong the lifetime of the process itself (the
process is supposed to own the thread, not the other way around).
We don't need to potentially heap-allocate a std::string instance here,
given the data is known ahead of time. We can just place it within an
array and pass this to the mbedtls functions.
Neither of these functions require the use of shared ownership of the
returned pointer. This makes it more difficult to create reference
cycles with, and makes the interface more generic, as std::shared_ptr
instances can be created from a std::unique_ptr, but the vice-versa
isn't possible. This also alters relevant functions to take NCA
arguments by const reference rather than a const reference to a
std::shared_ptr. These functions don't alter the ownership of the memory
used by the NCA instance, so we can make the interface more generic by
not assuming anything about the type of smart pointer the NCA is
contained within and make it the caller's responsibility to ensure the
supplied NCA is valid.
We can just compare the existing std::vector instance with a constexpr
std::array containing the desired match. This is lighter resource-wise,
as we don't need to allocate on the heap.
Adds missing includes to prevent potential compilation issues in the
future. Also moves the definition of a struct into the cpp file, so that
some includes don't need to be introduced within the header.
When loading NROs, svcBreak is called to signal to the debugger that a new "module" is loaded. As no debugger is technically attached we shouldn't be killing the programs execution.
Hardware tests show that trying to unmap an unmapped buffer already should always succeed. Hardware test was tested up to 32 iterations of attempting to unmap
This was the result of a typo accidentally introduced in
e51d715700. This restores the previous
correct behavior.
The behavior with the reference was incorrect and would cause some games
to fail to boot.
Conceptually, it doesn't make sense for a thread to be able to persist
the lifetime of a scheduler. A scheduler should be taking care of the
threads; the threads should not be taking care of the scheduler.
If the threads outlive the scheduler (or we simply don't actually
terminate/shutdown the threads), then it should be considered a bug
that we need to fix.
Attributing this to balika011, as they opened #1317 to attempt to fix
this in a similar way, but my refactoring of the kernel code caused
quite a few conflicts.
Specifically bugs/crashes that arise when putting them in positions that are legal but not typical, such as midline, between patch data, or between patch records.
