Reverse stride align restriction on FastSwizzle due to lost performance
This commit is contained in:
parent
d2dd1289bd
commit
57b44200a2
1 changed files with 2 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void FastSwizzleData(u32 width, u32 height, u32 bytes_per_pixel, u32 out_
|
|||
const std::size_t pixel_base{y * width * out_bytes_per_pixel};
|
||||
const auto& table = fast_swizzle_table[y % gobs_in_y];
|
||||
for (std::size_t xb = 0; xb < stride; xb += copy_size) {
|
||||
const std::size_t truncated_copy = std::min(copy_size, stride - xb);
|
||||
const std::size_t gob_address{initial_gob +
|
||||
(xb / gobs_in_x) * gobs_size * block_height};
|
||||
const std::size_t swizzle_offset{gob_address + table[(xb / 16) % 4]};
|
||||
|
@ -93,14 +92,14 @@ static void FastSwizzleData(u32 width, u32 height, u32 bytes_per_pixel, u32 out_
|
|||
const std::size_t pixel_index{out_x + pixel_base};
|
||||
data_ptrs[unswizzle] = swizzled_data + swizzle_offset;
|
||||
data_ptrs[!unswizzle] = unswizzled_data + pixel_index;
|
||||
std::memcpy(data_ptrs[0], data_ptrs[1], truncated_copy);
|
||||
std::memcpy(data_ptrs[0], data_ptrs[1], copy_size);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void CopySwizzledData(u32 width, u32 height, u32 bytes_per_pixel, u32 out_bytes_per_pixel,
|
||||
u8* swizzled_data, u8* unswizzled_data, bool unswizzle, u32 block_height) {
|
||||
if (bytes_per_pixel % 3 != 0) {
|
||||
if (bytes_per_pixel % 3 != 0 && (width * bytes_per_pixel) % 16 == 0) {
|
||||
FastSwizzleData(width, height, bytes_per_pixel, out_bytes_per_pixel, swizzled_data,
|
||||
unswizzled_data, unswizzle, block_height);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue