nixpkgs-suyu/pkgs/stdenv/generic/check-meta.nix
Graham Christensen b80c9ce4a9
stdenv: Validate meta.outputsToInstall
If meta.outputsToInstall is set to include absent outputs, various
tools break including channel updates and nix-env.

    grahamc@Morbo> nix-env -i -f . -A elf-header-real
    installing 'elf-header'
    error: this derivation has bad 'meta.outputsToInstall'

This patch verifies each value in meta.outputsToInstall is a valid
output. It validates this condition only if checkMeta is true.

    grahamc@Morbo> nix-build . -A elf-header-real
    error: Package ‘elf-header’ in /home/grahamc/projects/nixpkgs/pkgs/development/libraries/elf-header/default.nix:36 has invalid meta.outputsToInstall, refusing to evaluate.

    The package elf-header has set meta.outputsToInstall to: bin

    however elf-header only has the outputs: out

    and is missing the following ouputs:

      - bin

    (use '--show-trace' to show detailed location information)

Note, now the nix-env experience is decidedly worse for users who have
checkMeta set to true:

    grahamc@Morbo> nix-env -i -f . -A elf-header-real; echo $?
    0

though since this is already an issue for unfree, broken, unsupported,
and insecure validity problems I'm not sure we should do something
different here.
2018-09-18 10:38:44 -04:00

243 lines
9.1 KiB
Nix
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Checks derivation meta and attrs for problems (like brokenness,
# licenses, etc).
{ lib, config, hostPlatform, meta }:
let
# See discussion at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/25304#issuecomment-298385426
# for why this defaults to false, but I (@copumpkin) want to default it to true soon.
shouldCheckMeta = config.checkMeta or false;
allowUnfree = config.allowUnfree or false
|| builtins.getEnv "NIXPKGS_ALLOW_UNFREE" == "1";
whitelist = config.whitelistedLicenses or [];
blacklist = config.blacklistedLicenses or [];
onlyLicenses = list:
lib.lists.all (license:
let l = lib.licenses.${license.shortName or "BROKEN"} or false; in
if license == l then true else
throw ''${showLicense license} is not an attribute of lib.licenses''
) list;
areLicenseListsValid =
if lib.mutuallyExclusive whitelist blacklist then
assert onlyLicenses whitelist; assert onlyLicenses blacklist; true
else
throw "whitelistedLicenses and blacklistedLicenses are not mutually exclusive.";
hasLicense = attrs:
attrs ? meta.license;
hasWhitelistedLicense = assert areLicenseListsValid; attrs:
hasLicense attrs && builtins.elem attrs.meta.license whitelist;
hasBlacklistedLicense = assert areLicenseListsValid; attrs:
hasLicense attrs && builtins.elem attrs.meta.license blacklist;
allowBroken = config.allowBroken or false
|| builtins.getEnv "NIXPKGS_ALLOW_BROKEN" == "1";
allowUnsupportedSystem = config.allowUnsupportedSystem or false
|| builtins.getEnv "NIXPKGS_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED_SYSTEM" == "1";
isUnfree = licenses: lib.lists.any (l:
!l.free or true || l == "unfree" || l == "unfree-redistributable") licenses;
# Alow granular checks to allow only some unfree packages
# Example:
# {pkgs, ...}:
# {
# allowUnfree = false;
# allowUnfreePredicate = (x: pkgs.lib.hasPrefix "flashplayer-" x.name);
# }
allowUnfreePredicate = config.allowUnfreePredicate or (x: false);
# Check whether unfree packages are allowed and if not, whether the
# package has an unfree license and is not explicitely allowed by the
# `allowUNfreePredicate` function.
hasDeniedUnfreeLicense = attrs:
!allowUnfree &&
hasLicense attrs &&
isUnfree (lib.lists.toList attrs.meta.license) &&
!allowUnfreePredicate attrs;
allowInsecureDefaultPredicate = x: builtins.elem x.name (config.permittedInsecurePackages or []);
allowInsecurePredicate = x: (config.allowInsecurePredicate or allowInsecureDefaultPredicate) x;
hasAllowedInsecure = attrs:
(attrs.meta.knownVulnerabilities or []) == [] ||
allowInsecurePredicate attrs ||
builtins.getEnv "NIXPKGS_ALLOW_INSECURE" == "1";
showLicense = license: license.shortName or "unknown";
pos_str = meta.position or "«unknown-file»";
remediation = {
unfree = remediate_whitelist "Unfree";
broken = remediate_whitelist "Broken";
unsupported = remediate_whitelist "UnsupportedSystem";
blacklisted = x: "";
insecure = remediate_insecure;
broken-outputs = remediateOutputsToInstall;
unknown-meta = x: "";
};
remediate_whitelist = allow_attr: attrs:
''
a) For `nixos-rebuild` you can set
{ nixpkgs.config.allow${allow_attr} = true; }
in configuration.nix to override this.
b) For `nix-env`, `nix-build`, `nix-shell` or any other Nix command you can add
{ allow${allow_attr} = true; }
to ~/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix.
'';
remediate_insecure = attrs:
''
Known issues:
'' + (lib.concatStrings (map (issue: " - ${issue}\n") attrs.meta.knownVulnerabilities)) + ''
You can install it anyway by whitelisting this package, using the
following methods:
a) for `nixos-rebuild` you can add ${attrs.name or "«name-missing»"} to
`nixpkgs.config.permittedInsecurePackages` in the configuration.nix,
like so:
{
nixpkgs.config.permittedInsecurePackages = [
"${attrs.name or "«name-missing»"}"
];
}
b) For `nix-env`, `nix-build`, `nix-shell` or any other Nix command you can add
${attrs.name or "«name-missing»"} to `permittedInsecurePackages` in
~/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix, like so:
{
permittedInsecurePackages = [
"${attrs.name or "«name-missing»"}"
];
}
'';
remediateOutputsToInstall = attrs: let
expectedOutputs = attrs.meta.outputsToInstall or [];
actualOutputs = attrs.outputs or [ "out" ];
missingOutputs = builtins.filter (output: ! builtins.elem output actualOutputs) expectedOutputs;
in ''
The package ${attrs.name} has set meta.outputsToInstall to: ${builtins.concatStringsSep ", " expectedOutputs}
however ${attrs.name} only has the outputs: ${builtins.concatStringsSep ", " actualOutputs}
and is missing the following ouputs:
${lib.concatStrings (builtins.map (output: " - ${output}\n") missingOutputs)}
'';
handleEvalIssue = attrs: { reason , errormsg ? "" }:
let
msg = ''
Package ${attrs.name or "«name-missing»"} in ${pos_str} ${errormsg}, refusing to evaluate.
'' + (builtins.getAttr reason remediation) attrs;
handler = if config ? "handleEvalIssue"
then config.handleEvalIssue reason
else throw;
in handler msg;
metaTypes = with lib.types; rec {
# These keys are documented
description = str;
longDescription = str;
branch = str;
homepage = either (listOf str) str;
downloadPage = str;
license = either (listOf lib.types.attrs) (either lib.types.attrs str);
maintainers = listOf (attrsOf str);
priority = int;
platforms = listOf (either str lib.systems.parsedPlatform.types.system);
hydraPlatforms = listOf str;
broken = bool;
# Weirder stuff that doesn't appear in the documentation?
knownVulnerabilities = listOf str;
name = str;
version = str;
tag = str;
updateWalker = bool;
executables = listOf str;
outputsToInstall = listOf str;
position = str;
available = bool;
repositories = attrsOf str;
isBuildPythonPackage = platforms;
schedulingPriority = int;
downloadURLRegexp = str;
isFcitxEngine = bool;
isIbusEngine = bool;
isGutenprint = bool;
badPlatforms = platforms;
# Hydra build timeout
timeout = int;
};
checkMetaAttr = k: v:
if metaTypes?${k} then
if metaTypes.${k}.check v then null else "key '${k}' has a value ${toString v} of an invalid type ${builtins.typeOf v}; expected ${metaTypes.${k}.description}"
else "key '${k}' is unrecognized; expected one of: \n\t [${lib.concatMapStringsSep ", " (x: "'${x}'") (lib.attrNames metaTypes)}]";
checkMeta = meta: if shouldCheckMeta then lib.remove null (lib.mapAttrsToList checkMetaAttr meta) else [];
checkPlatform = attrs: let
anyMatch = lib.any (lib.meta.platformMatch hostPlatform);
in anyMatch (attrs.meta.platforms or lib.platforms.all) &&
! anyMatch (attrs.meta.badPlatforms or []);
checkOutputsToInstall = attrs: let
expectedOutputs = attrs.meta.outputsToInstall or [];
actualOutputs = attrs.outputs or [ "out" ];
missingOutputs = builtins.filter (output: ! builtins.elem output actualOutputs) expectedOutputs;
in if shouldCheckMeta
then builtins.length missingOutputs > 0
else false;
# Check if a derivation is valid, that is whether it passes checks for
# e.g brokenness or license.
#
# Return { valid: Bool } and additionally
# { reason: String; errormsg: String } if it is not valid, where
# reason is one of "unfree", "blacklisted" or "broken".
checkValidity = attrs:
if hasDeniedUnfreeLicense attrs && !(hasWhitelistedLicense attrs) then
{ valid = false; reason = "unfree"; errormsg = "has an unfree license (${showLicense attrs.meta.license})"; }
else if hasBlacklistedLicense attrs then
{ valid = false; reason = "blacklisted"; errormsg = "has a blacklisted license (${showLicense attrs.meta.license})"; }
else if !allowBroken && attrs.meta.broken or false then
{ valid = false; reason = "broken"; errormsg = "is marked as broken"; }
else if !allowUnsupportedSystem && !(checkPlatform attrs) then
{ valid = false; reason = "unsupported"; errormsg = "is not supported on ${hostPlatform.config}"; }
else if !(hasAllowedInsecure attrs) then
{ valid = false; reason = "insecure"; errormsg = "is marked as insecure"; }
else if checkOutputsToInstall attrs then
{ valid = false; reason = "broken-outputs"; errormsg = "has invalid meta.outputsToInstall"; }
else let res = checkMeta (attrs.meta or {}); in if res != [] then
{ valid = false; reason = "unknown-meta"; errormsg = "has an invalid meta attrset:${lib.concatMapStrings (x: "\n\t - " + x) res}"; }
else { valid = true; };
assertValidity = attrs: let
validity = checkValidity attrs;
in validity // {
# Throw an error if trying to evaluate an non-valid derivation
handled = if !validity.valid
then handleEvalIssue attrs (removeAttrs validity ["valid"])
else true;
};
in assertValidity