Commit graph

13 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ben Siraphob
8c5d37129f pkgs/tools: stdenv.lib -> lib 2021-01-15 17:12:36 +07:00
Profpatsch
4a7f99d55d treewide: with stdenv.lib; in meta -> with lib;
Part of: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/108938

meta = with stdenv.lib;

is a widely used pattern. We want to slowly remove
the `stdenv.lib` indirection and encourage people
to use `lib` directly. Thus let’s start with the meta
field.

This used a rewriting script to mostly automatically
replace all occurances of this pattern, and add the
`lib` argument to the package header if it doesn’t
exist yet.

The script in its current form is available at
https://cs.tvl.fyi/depot@2f807d7f141068d2d60676a89213eaa5353ca6e0/-/blob/users/Profpatsch/nixpkgs-rewriter/default.nix
2021-01-11 10:38:22 +01:00
Ben Siraphob
683a87dbeb treewide: remove periods from end of package descriptions 2020-10-17 08:22:31 -07:00
Michael Reilly
84cf00f980
treewide: Per RFC45, remove all unquoted URLs 2020-04-10 17:54:53 +01:00
R. RyanTM
7ee13b98fb ocserv: 0.12.5 -> 0.12.6 2020-01-06 21:12:15 -08:00
Maximilian Bosch
9842c4b107
treewide: update which packages I'm currently maintaining
Idea shamelessly stolen from 4e60b0efae.

I realized that I don't really know anymore where I'm listed as maintainer and what
I'm actually (co)-maintaining which means that I can't proactively take
care of packages I officially maintain.

As I don't have the time, energy and motivation to take care of stuff I
was interested in 1 or 2 years ago (or packaged for someone else in the
past), I decided that I make this explicit by removing myself from several
packages and adding myself in some other stuff I'm now interested in.

I've seen it several times now that people remove themselves from a
package without removing the package if it's unmaintained after that
which is why I figured that it's fine in my case as the affected pkgs
are rather low-prio and were pretty easy to maintain.
2019-12-26 15:27:47 +01:00
R. RyanTM
bd8d1a31f4 ocserv: 0.12.4 -> 0.12.5 2019-11-02 09:00:38 -07:00
volth
46420bbaa3 treewide: name -> pname (easy cases) (#66585)
treewide replacement of

stdenv.mkDerivation rec {
  name = "*-${version}";
  version = "*";

to pname
2019-08-15 13:41:18 +01:00
R. RyanTM
b44996fe05 ocserv: 0.12.3 -> 0.12.4
Semi-automatic update generated by
https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made
based on information from
https://repology.org/metapackage/ocserv/versions
2019-07-15 20:20:04 -07:00
volth
f3282c8d1e treewide: remove unused variables (#63177)
* treewide: remove unused variables

* making ofborg happy
2019-06-16 19:59:05 +00:00
R. RyanTM
72a198fc60 ocserv: 0.12.2 -> 0.12.3 (#58730)
Semi-automatic update generated by
https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made
based on information from
https://repology.org/metapackage/ocserv/versions
2019-04-09 22:45:23 +02:00
R. RyanTM
f87dd8926f ocserv: 0.12.1 -> 0.12.2
Semi-automatic update generated by
https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made
based on information from
https://repology.org/metapackage/ocserv/versions
2019-01-17 02:06:12 -08:00
Maximilian Bosch
cd5e01edd9 ocserv: init at 0.12.1 (#42871)
`ocserv` is a VPN server which follows the openconnect protocol
(https://github.com/openconnect/protocol). The packaging is slightly
inspired by the AUR version
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ocserv/).

This patch initializes the package written in C, the man pages and a
module for a simple systemd unit to run the VPN server. The package
supports the following authentication methods for the server:

* `plain` (mostly username/password)
* `pam`

The third method (`radius`) is currently not supported since `nixpkgs`
misses a packaged client.

The module can be used like this:

``` nix
{
  services.ocserv = {
    enable = true;
    config = ''
      ...
    '';
  };
}
```

The option `services.ocserv.config` is required on purpose to
ensure that nobody just enables the service and experiences unexpected
side-effects on the system. For a full reference, please refer to the
man pages, the online docs or the example value.

The docs recommend to simply use `nobody` as user, so no extra user has
been added to the internal user list. Instead a configuration like
this can be used:

```
run-as-user = nobody
run-as-group = nogroup
```

/cc @tenten8401
Fixes #42594
2018-08-01 21:39:09 +02:00