These derivations have not seen any updates since they were created in 2010,
and some of their sources have disappeared. There are upstream configs for
these boards, so these are now used, and they build correctly. I have no way
of testing them, and I don't if anyone even uses either board with Nix anymore.
(cherry picked from commit 01020b3263)
(cherry picked from commit 48ade50d8ece09d3ff732b07f0facdcd78084ac3)
Following legacy packing conventions, `isArm` was defined just for
32-bit ARM instruction set. This is confusing to non packagers though,
because Aarch64 is an ARM instruction set.
The official ARM overview for ARMv8[1] is surprisingly not confusing,
given the overall state of affairs for ARM naming conventions, and
offers us a solution. It divides the nomenclature into three levels:
```
ISA: ARMv8 {-A, -R, -M}
/ \
Mode: Aarch32 Aarch64
| / \
Encoding: A64 A32 T32
```
At the top is the overall v8 instruction set archicture. Second are the
two modes, defined by bitwidth but differing in other semantics too, and
buttom are the encodings, (hopefully?) isomorphic if they encode the
same mode.
The 32 bit encodings are mostly backwards compatible with previous
non-Thumb and Thumb encodings, and if so we can pun the mode names to
instead mean "sets of compatable or isomorphic encodings", and then
voilà we have nice names for 32-bit and 64-bit arm instruction sets
which do not use the word ARM so as to not confused either laymen or
experienced ARM packages.
[1]: https://developer.arm.com/products/architecture/a-profile
(cherry picked from commit ba52ae5048)
Source master rebase of my [PR #34].
Eventually, we might consider doing something for GNU binutils too, in
order that we switch (the normal) ld-wrapper to always use this to
leverage ld to resolve libraries, rather than faking it in bash.
[PR #34]: https://github.com/tpoechtrager/cctools-port/pull/34
Instead of intersecting system strings, we filter with the sort of
patterns used in `meta.platforms`.
Indicating this change `forTheseSystems` has been renamed to
`forMatchingSystems`, since the given list is now patterns to match, and
not the systems themselves. [Just as with `meta.platforms`, systems
strings are also supported for backwards compatibility.]
This is more flexible, and makes the `forMatchingSystems` and
packagePlatforms` cases more analogous.
Negative reasoning like `allBut` is a bad idea with an open world of
platforms. Concretely, if we add a new, quite different sort of
platform, existing packages with `allBut` will claim they work on it
even though they probably won't.
