The web_access.patch would no longer apply.
It disabled a check that required the static files
for the web UI to be owned by the user the daemon runs as
(not root, so it doesn't work well with nix).
Besides updating netdata, this commit removes that patch,
changes the netdata service config to set the "web files owner/group"
option to "root" and adds a test that checks that the web UI is being served.
This allows the web files to be owned by root without patching.
Broke evaluation of the nixos options.
The option `services.dysnomia' defined in `.../nixos/modules/rename.nix' does not exist.
This reverts commit 5c897b4eff.
The server is not verified over the git:// transfer protocol. If you
clone a repository over git://, you should check if the latest commit's
hash is correct.
On the other hand, https:// will always verify the server automatically,
using certificate authorities.
Use nixos-fw chain instead of INPUT so that the rules don't keep
stacking everytime the firewall is reloaded.
This also adds a comment to each rule about the associated exporter.
- based on module originally written by @srhb
- complies with available options in cfssl v1.3.2
- uid and gid 299 reserved in ids.nix
- added simple nixos test case
Fixes#30891
* Upgrade `graphite-web`, `carbon` and `whisper` from 1.0.2 -> 1.1.3.
* Replaced the deprecated `pythonPackages.graphite_influxdb` with
`pythonPackages.influxgraph.`
* Renamed `pythonPackages.graphite_web` to `pythonPackages.graphite-web`
to be consistent with the Python package name.
* Replaced the unmaintained `pythonPackages.graphite_pager` with
`pythonPackages.graphitepager`
* Moved all new packages from `python-packages.nix` to
`pkgs/development/python-modules`
Since 4f6df27aee, nix.useSandbox defaults
to true which causes the Nix build within the containers-imperative test
to fail while trying to hardlink files into the chroot:
link("/nix/store/foo", "/nix/store/bar.drv.chroot/nix/store/foo")
= -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted)
The reason this happens is that the hosts store is mounted using 9p and
an overlayfs is mounted on top, so even if we would disable the tmpfs
for the upper directory the hardlink would still cross filesystem
boundaries, which then fails with the above error code.
I haven't yet seen any other test which fails in a similar way, which
might be because building within VM tests is not very common and the
installer tests build in a separate store, so they're not affected.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@nix.build>
Issue: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/2324
Cc: @aristidb, @edolstra, @chaoflow, @kampfschlaefer
`ocserv` is a VPN server which follows the openconnect protocol
(https://github.com/openconnect/protocol). The packaging is slightly
inspired by the AUR version
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ocserv/).
This patch initializes the package written in C, the man pages and a
module for a simple systemd unit to run the VPN server. The package
supports the following authentication methods for the server:
* `plain` (mostly username/password)
* `pam`
The third method (`radius`) is currently not supported since `nixpkgs`
misses a packaged client.
The module can be used like this:
``` nix
{
services.ocserv = {
enable = true;
config = ''
...
'';
};
}
```
The option `services.ocserv.config` is required on purpose to
ensure that nobody just enables the service and experiences unexpected
side-effects on the system. For a full reference, please refer to the
man pages, the online docs or the example value.
The docs recommend to simply use `nobody` as user, so no extra user has
been added to the internal user list. Instead a configuration like
this can be used:
```
run-as-user = nobody
run-as-group = nogroup
```
/cc @tenten8401
Fixes#42594
The default session might be found in `extraSessionFilePackages`, but it's not
viable to detect at evaluation time, so emit a warning.
In LightDM instead of checking `defaultSessionName` against
`displayManager.session.names` we rely on the assertions in
`desktopManager` and `windowMananger` and just check that there's at least one
default set. The second assertion could never actually be triggered.
