Semi-automatic update generated by https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update tools.
This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/metapackage/stellarium/versions.
These checks were done:
- built on NixOS
- Warning: no invocation of /nix/store/2c607ylvxs69nbr99ly1bgcb0bbk47xf-stellarium-0.18.1/bin/stellarium had a zero exit code or showed the expected version
- Warning: no invocation of /nix/store/2c607ylvxs69nbr99ly1bgcb0bbk47xf-stellarium-0.18.1/bin/.stellarium-wrapped had a zero exit code or showed the expected version
- 0 of 2 passed binary check by having a zero exit code.
- 0 of 2 passed binary check by having the new version present in output.
- found 0.18.1 with grep in /nix/store/2c607ylvxs69nbr99ly1bgcb0bbk47xf-stellarium-0.18.1
- directory tree listing: https://gist.github.com/dd98359fb1214ae24bd70e291c1bc33d
- du listing: https://gist.github.com/67baedda5ffc1ad0aa064239cb503c2b
The 0.16-releases contain several useful new features:
https://launchpad.net/stellarium/0.16/0.16.1
I also added myself as maintainer to have more people available if the
package breaks a release.
* pkgs: refactor needless quoting of homepage meta attribute
A lot of packages are needlessly quoting the homepage meta attribute
(about 1400, 22%), this commit refactors all of those instances.
* pkgs: Fixing some links that were wrongfully unquoted in the previous
commit
* Fixed some instances
The build with the modularized qt expression succeeded, but the resulting binary
would crash immediately, complaining about the lack of a "qt.labs.shader" module.
This patch works around that issue.
This fixes builds after #4419. Thanks to @vbgl for the original commit;
I changed that as I'm not sure whether passing null values to buildInputs is clean.
CC maintainers: @coroa, @peti, @phreedom, @robberer, @jcumming.
(My OCD kicked in today...)
Remove repeated package names, capitalize first word, remove trailing
periods and move overlong descriptions to longDescription.
I also simplified some descriptions as well, when they were particularly
long or technical, often based on Arch Linux' package descriptions.
I've tried to stay away from generated expressions (and I think I
succeeded).
Some specifics worth mentioning:
* cron, has "Vixie Cron" in its description. The "Vixie" part is not
mentioned anywhere else. I kept it in a parenthesis at the end of the
description.
* ctags description started with "Exuberant Ctags ...", and the
"exuberant" part is not mentioned elsewhere. Kept it in a parenthesis
at the end of description.
* nix has the description "The Nix Deployment System". Since that
doesn't really say much what it is/does (especially after removing
the package name!), I changed that to "Powerful package manager that
makes package management reliable and reproducible" (borrowed from
nixos.org).
* Tons of "GNU Foo, Foo is a [the important bits]" descriptions
is changed to just [the important bits]. If the package name doesn't
contain GNU I don't think it's needed to say it in the description
either.
