Merge pull request #13409 from mayflower/doc/meta-licenses-str
nixpkgs manual: Fix license strings docs
This commit is contained in:
commit
edad1786a1
1 changed files with 21 additions and 12 deletions
25
doc/meta.xml
25
doc/meta.xml
|
@ -258,20 +258,25 @@ a value from <varname>stdenv.lib.licenses</varname> defined in
|
|||
<link xlink:href="https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/lib/licenses.nix">
|
||||
<filename>nixpkgs/lib/licenses.nix</filename></link>,
|
||||
or in-place license description of the same format if the license is
|
||||
unlikely to be useful in another expression.
|
||||
unlikely to be useful in another expression.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Although it's typically better to indicate the specific license,
|
||||
a few generic options are available:
|
||||
|
||||
A few generic options are available, although it's typically better
|
||||
to indicate the specific license:
|
||||
<variablelist>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
<term><varname>free</varname></term>
|
||||
<term><varname>stdenv.lib.licenses.free</varname>,
|
||||
<varname>"free"</varname></term>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem><para>Catch-all for free software licenses not listed
|
||||
above.</para></listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
<term><varname>unfree-redistributable</varname></term>
|
||||
<term><varname>stdenv.lib.licenses.unfreeRedistributable</varname>,
|
||||
<varname>"unfree-redistributable"</varname></term>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem><para>Unfree package that can be redistributed in binary
|
||||
form. That is, it’s legal to redistribute the
|
||||
<emphasis>output</emphasis> of the derivation. This means that
|
||||
|
@ -283,12 +288,14 @@ to indicate the specific license:
|
|||
original binaries; otherwise we’re breaking the license. For
|
||||
instance, the NVIDIA X11 drivers can be redistributed unmodified,
|
||||
but our builder applies <command>patchelf</command> to make them
|
||||
work. Thus, its license is <varname>unfree</varname> and it
|
||||
work. Thus, its license is <varname>"unfree"</varname> and it
|
||||
cannot be included in the Nixpkgs channel.</para></listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
<term><varname>unfree</varname></term>
|
||||
<term><varname>stdenv.lib.licenses.unfree</varname>,
|
||||
<varname>"unfree"</varname></term>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem><para>Unfree package that cannot be redistributed. You
|
||||
can build it yourself, but you cannot redistribute the output of
|
||||
the derivation. Thus it cannot be included in the Nixpkgs
|
||||
|
@ -296,7 +303,9 @@ to indicate the specific license:
|
|||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
<term><varname>unfree-redistributable-firmware</varname></term>
|
||||
<term><varname>stdenv.lib.licenses.unfreeRedistributableFirmware</varname>,
|
||||
<varname>"unfree-redistributable-firmware"</varname></term>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem><para>This package supplies unfree, redistributable
|
||||
firmware. This is a separate value from
|
||||
<varname>unfree-redistributable</varname> because not everybody
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue