BoomMicrophone/nixpkgs-suyu
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

tests.nixpkgs-check-by-name: Various minor improvements

Browse source 
Co-Authored-By: Philip Taron <philip.taron@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Silvan Mosberger 2024-03-01 01:12:11 +01:00
parent 64da6178bf
commit 2e8d778994
38 changed files with 261 additions and 212 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

173
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/eval.rs
View file

@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
use crate::nix_file::CallPackageArgumentInfo;
use crate::nixpkgs_problem::NixpkgsProblem;
use crate::ratchet;
use crate::ratchet::RatchetState::Loose;
use crate::ratchet::RatchetState::Tight;
use crate::structure;
use crate::utils;
use crate::validation::ResultIteratorExt as _;
@ -296,84 +299,27 @@ fn by_name(
let nix_file = nix_file_store.get(&location.file)?;
// The relative path of the Nix file, for error messages
let relative_file =
location.relative_file(nixpkgs_path).with_context(|| {
format!(
"Failed to resolve location file of attribute {attribute_name}"
)
})?;
let relative_location_file = location.relative_file(nixpkgs_path).with_context(|| {
format!("Failed to resolve the file where attribute {attribute_name} is defined")
})?;
// Figure out whether it's an attribute definition of the form `= callPackage <arg1> <arg2>`,
// returning the arguments if so.
let (optional_syntactic_call_package, definition) = nix_file.call_package_argument_info_at(
location.line,
location.column,
nixpkgs_path,
).with_context(|| format!("Failed to get the definition info for attribute {attribute_name}"))?;
let (optional_syntactic_call_package, definition) = nix_file
.call_package_argument_info_at(location.line, location.column, nixpkgs_path)
.with_context(|| {
format!("Failed to get the definition info for attribute {attribute_name}")
})?;
// At this point, we completed two different checks for whether it's a
// `callPackage`
match (is_semantic_call_package, optional_syntactic_call_package) {
// Something like `<attr> = foo`
(_, None) => NixpkgsProblem::NonSyntacticCallPackage {
package_name: attribute_name.to_owned(),
file: relative_file,
line: location.line,
column: location.column,
definition,
}
.into(),
// Something like `<attr> = pythonPackages.callPackage ...`
(false, Some(_)) => NixpkgsProblem::NonToplevelCallPackage {
package_name: attribute_name.to_owned(),
file: relative_file,
line: location.line,
column: location.column,
definition,
}
.into(),
// Something like `<attr> = pkgs.callPackage ...`
(true, Some(syntactic_call_package)) => {
if let Some(path) = syntactic_call_package.relative_path {
if path == relative_package_file {
// Manual definitions with empty arguments are not allowed
// anymore
Success(if syntactic_call_package.empty_arg {
Loose(NixpkgsProblem::EmptyArgument {
package_name: attribute_name.to_owned(),
file: relative_file,
line: location.line,
column: location.column,
definition,
})
} else {
Tight
})
} else {
// Wrong path
NixpkgsProblem::WrongCallPackagePath {
package_name: attribute_name.to_owned(),
file: relative_file,
line: location.line,
column: location.column,
actual_path: path,
expected_path: relative_package_file,
}
.into()
}
} else {
// No path
NixpkgsProblem::NonPath {
package_name: attribute_name.to_owned(),
file: relative_file,
line: location.line,
column: location.column,
definition,
}
.into()
}
}
}
by_name_override(
attribute_name,
relative_package_file,
is_semantic_call_package,
optional_syntactic_call_package,
definition,
location,
relative_location_file,
)
} else {
// If manual definitions don't have a location, it's likely `mapAttrs`'d
// over, e.g. if it's defined in aliases.nix.
@ -401,6 +347,85 @@ fn by_name(
)
}
/// Handles the case for packages in `pkgs/by-name` that are manually overridden, e.g. in
/// all-packages.nix
fn by_name_override(
attribute_name: &str,
expected_package_file: PathBuf,
is_semantic_call_package: bool,
optional_syntactic_call_package: Option<CallPackageArgumentInfo>,
definition: String,
location: Location,
relative_location_file: PathBuf,
) -> validation::Validation<ratchet::RatchetState<ratchet::ManualDefinition>> {
// At this point, we completed two different checks for whether it's a
// `callPackage`
match (is_semantic_call_package, optional_syntactic_call_package) {
// Something like `<attr> = foo`
(_, None) => NixpkgsProblem::NonSyntacticCallPackage {
package_name: attribute_name.to_owned(),
file: relative_location_file,
line: location.line,
column: location.column,
definition,
}
.into(),
// Something like `<attr> = pythonPackages.callPackage ...`
(false, Some(_)) => NixpkgsProblem::NonToplevelCallPackage {
package_name: attribute_name.to_owned(),
file: relative_location_file,
line: location.line,
column: location.column,
definition,
}
.into(),
// Something like `<attr> = pkgs.callPackage ...`
(true, Some(syntactic_call_package)) => {
if let Some(actual_package_file) = syntactic_call_package.relative_path {
if actual_package_file != expected_package_file {
// Wrong path
NixpkgsProblem::WrongCallPackagePath {
package_name: attribute_name.to_owned(),
file: relative_location_file,
line: location.line,
actual_path: actual_package_file,
expected_path: expected_package_file,
}
.into()
} else {
// Manual definitions with empty arguments are not allowed
// anymore, but existing ones should continue to be allowed
let manual_definition_ratchet = if syntactic_call_package.empty_arg {
// This is the state to migrate away from
Loose(NixpkgsProblem::EmptyArgument {
package_name: attribute_name.to_owned(),
file: relative_location_file,
line: location.line,
column: location.column,
definition,
})
} else {
// This is the state to migrate to
Tight
};
Success(manual_definition_ratchet)
}
} else {
// No path
NixpkgsProblem::NonPath {
package_name: attribute_name.to_owned(),
file: relative_location_file,
line: location.line,
column: location.column,
definition,
}
.into()
}
}
}
}
/// Handles the evaluation result for an attribute _not_ in `pkgs/by-name`,
/// turning it into a validation result.
fn handle_non_by_name_attribute(

13
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/main.rs
View file

@ -93,27 +93,25 @@ pub fn process<W: io::Write>(
for error in errors {
writeln!(error_writer, "{}", error.to_string().red())?
}
writeln!(error_writer, "{}", "The base branch is broken and still has above problems with this PR, these need to be fixed first.\nConsider reverting the PR that introduced these problems in order to prevent more failures of unrelated PRs.".yellow())?;
writeln!(error_writer, "{}", "The base branch is broken and still has above problems with this PR, which need to be fixed first.\nConsider reverting the PR that introduced these problems in order to prevent more failures of unrelated PRs.".yellow())?;
Ok(false)
}
(Failure(_), Success(_)) => {
// Base branch fails, but the PR fixes it
writeln!(
error_writer,
"{}",
"The base branch was broken, but this PR fixes it, nice job!".green()
"The base branch is broken, but this PR fixes it. Nice job!".green()
)?;
Ok(true)
}
(Success(_), Failure(errors)) => {
// Base branch succeeds, the PR breaks it
for error in errors {
writeln!(error_writer, "{}", error.to_string().red())?
}
writeln!(
error_writer,
"{}",
"This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch"
"This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break."
.yellow()
)?;
Ok(false)
@ -125,7 +123,8 @@ pub fn process<W: io::Write>(
for error in errors {
writeln!(error_writer, "{}", error.to_string().red())?
}
writeln!(error_writer, "{}", "This PR introduces the above problems compared to the base branch, merging is discouraged, but would not break the base branch".yellow())?;
writeln!(error_writer, "{}", "This PR introduces additional instances of discouraged patterns as listed above. Merging is discouraged but would not break the base branch.".yellow())?;
Ok(false)
}
Success(()) => {
@ -225,7 +224,7 @@ mod tests {
test_nixpkgs(
"case_sensitive",
&path,
"pkgs/by-name/fo: Duplicate case-sensitive package directories \"foO\" and \"foo\".\nThis PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch\n",
"pkgs/by-name/fo: Duplicate case-sensitive package directories \"foO\" and \"foo\".\nThis PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.\n",
)?;
Ok(())

39
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/nix_file.rs
View file

@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
use crate::utils::LineIndex;
use anyhow::Context;
use itertools::Either::{self, Left, Right};
use rnix::ast;
use rnix::ast::Expr;
use rnix::ast::HasEntry;
@ -86,8 +87,8 @@ pub struct CallPackageArgumentInfo {
impl NixFile {
/// Returns information about callPackage arguments for an attribute at a specific line/column
/// index.
/// If the location is not of the form `<attr> = callPackage <arg1> <arg2>;`, `Ok((None, String))` is
/// returned, with String being how the definition looks like.
/// If the definition at the given location is not of the form `<attr> = callPackage <arg1> <arg2>;`,
/// `Ok((None, String))` is returned, with `String` being the definition itself.
///
/// This function only returns `Err` for problems that can't be caused by the Nix contents,
/// but rather problems in this programs code itself.
@ -124,8 +125,8 @@ impl NixFile {
relative_to: &Path,
) -> anyhow::Result<(Option<CallPackageArgumentInfo>, String)> {
Ok(match self.attrpath_value_at(line, column)? {
Err(definition) => (None, definition),
Ok(attrpath_value) => {
Left(definition) => (None, definition),
Right(attrpath_value) => {
let definition = attrpath_value.to_string();
let attrpath_value =
self.attrpath_value_call_package_argument_info(attrpath_value, relative_to)?;
@ -139,7 +140,7 @@ impl NixFile {
&self,
line: usize,
column: usize,
) -> anyhow::Result<Result<ast::AttrpathValue, String>> {
) -> anyhow::Result<Either<String, ast::AttrpathValue>> {
let index = self.line_index.fromlinecolumn(line, column);
let token_at_offset = self
@ -173,11 +174,11 @@ impl NixFile {
// This is the only other way how `builtins.unsafeGetAttrPos` can return
// attribute positions, but we only look for ones like `<attr-path> = <value>`, so
// ignore this
return Ok(Err(node.to_string()));
return Ok(Left(node.to_string()));
} else {
// However, anything else is not expected and smells like a bug
anyhow::bail!(
"Node in {} is neither an attribute node, nor an inherit node: {node:?}",
"Node in {} is neither an attribute node nor an inherit node: {node:?}",
self.path.display()
)
}
@ -217,7 +218,9 @@ impl NixFile {
// unwrap is fine because we confirmed that we can cast with the above check.
// We could avoid this `unwrap` for a `clone`, since `cast` consumes the argument,
// but we still need it for the error message when the cast fails.
Ok(Ok(ast::AttrpathValue::cast(attrpath_value_node).unwrap()))
Ok(Right(
ast::AttrpathValue::cast(attrpath_value_node).unwrap(),
))
}
// Internal function mainly to make attrpath_value_at independently testable
@ -446,24 +449,24 @@ mod tests {
// These are builtins.unsafeGetAttrPos locations for the attributes
let cases = [
(2, 3, Ok("foo = 1;")),
(3, 3, Ok(r#""bar" = 2;"#)),
(4, 3, Ok(r#"${"baz"} = 3;"#)),
(5, 3, Ok(r#""${"qux"}" = 4;"#)),
(8, 3, Ok("quux\n # B\n =\n # C\n 5\n # D\n ;")),
(17, 7, Ok("quuux/**/=/**/5/**/;")),
(19, 10, Err("inherit toInherit;")),
(20, 22, Err("inherit (toInherit) toInherit;")),
(2, 3, Right("foo = 1;")),
(3, 3, Right(r#""bar" = 2;"#)),
(4, 3, Right(r#"${"baz"} = 3;"#)),
(5, 3, Right(r#""${"qux"}" = 4;"#)),
(8, 3, Right("quux\n # B\n =\n # C\n 5\n # D\n ;")),
(17, 7, Right("quuux/**/=/**/5/**/;")),
(19, 10, Left("inherit toInherit;")),
(20, 22, Left("inherit (toInherit) toInherit;")),
];
for (line, column, expected_result) in cases {
let actual_result = nix_file
.attrpath_value_at(line, column)
.context(format!("line {line}, column {column}"))?
.map(|node| node.to_string());
.map_right(|node| node.to_string());
let owned_expected_result = expected_result
.map(|x| x.to_string())
.map_err(|x| x.to_string());
.map_left(|x| x.to_string());
assert_eq!(
actual_result, owned_expected_result,
"line {line}, column {column}"

126
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/nixpkgs_problem.rs
View file

@ -68,7 +68,6 @@ pub enum NixpkgsProblem {
package_name: String,
file: PathBuf,
line: usize,
column: usize,
actual_path: PathBuf,
expected_path: PathBuf,
},
@ -117,16 +116,24 @@ pub enum NixpkgsProblem {
text: String,
io_error: String,
},
MovedOutOfByName {
MovedOutOfByNameEmptyArg {
package_name: String,
call_package_path: Option<PathBuf>,
empty_arg: bool,
file: PathBuf,
},
NewPackageNotUsingByName {
MovedOutOfByNameNonEmptyArg {
package_name: String,
call_package_path: Option<PathBuf>,
file: PathBuf,
},
NewPackageNotUsingByNameEmptyArg {
package_name: String,
call_package_path: Option<PathBuf>,
file: PathBuf,
},
NewPackageNotUsingByNameNonEmptyArg {
package_name: String,
call_package_path: Option<PathBuf>,
empty_arg: bool,
file: PathBuf,
},
InternalCallPackageUsed {
@ -203,8 +210,7 @@ impl fmt::Display for NixpkgsProblem {
{package_name} = callPackage ./{} {{ /* ... */ }};
Notably the second argument must not be empty, which is not the case.
It is defined in {}:{} as
However, in this PR, the second argument is empty. See the definition in {}:{}:
{}
",
@ -222,8 +228,7 @@ impl fmt::Display for NixpkgsProblem {
{package_name} = callPackage ./{} {{ /* ... */ }};
This is however not the case: A different `callPackage` is used.
It is defined in {}:{} as
However, in this PR, a different `callPackage` is used. See the definition in {}:{}:
{}
",
@ -241,8 +246,7 @@ impl fmt::Display for NixpkgsProblem {
{package_name} = callPackage ./{} {{ /* ... */ }};
This is however not the case: The first callPackage argument is not right:
It is defined in {}:{} as
However, in this PR, the first `callPackage` argument is not a path. See the definition in {}:{}:
{}
",
@ -252,7 +256,7 @@ impl fmt::Display for NixpkgsProblem {
line,
indent_definition(*column, definition.clone()),
),
NixpkgsProblem::WrongCallPackagePath { package_name, file, line, column, actual_path, expected_path } =>
NixpkgsProblem::WrongCallPackagePath { package_name, file, line, actual_path, expected_path } =>
writedoc! {
f,
"
@ -260,14 +264,13 @@ impl fmt::Display for NixpkgsProblem {
{package_name} = callPackage {} {{ /* ... */ }};
This is however not the case: The first `callPackage` argument is the wrong path.
It is defined in {}:{}:{} as
However, in this PR, the first `callPackage` argument is the wrong path. See the definition in {}:{}:
{package_name} = callPackage {} {{ /* ... */ }};
",
structure::relative_dir_for_package(package_name).display(),
create_path_expr(file, expected_path),
file.display(), line, column,
file.display(), line,
create_path_expr(file, actual_path),
},
NixpkgsProblem::NonSyntacticCallPackage { package_name, file, line, column, definition } => {
@ -278,8 +281,7 @@ impl fmt::Display for NixpkgsProblem {
{package_name} = callPackage ./{} {{ /* ... */ }};
This is however not the case.
It is defined in {}:{} as
However, in this PR, it isn't defined that way. See the definition in {}:{}
{}
",
@ -342,49 +344,48 @@ impl fmt::Display for NixpkgsProblem {
subpath.display(),
text,
),
NixpkgsProblem::MovedOutOfByName { package_name, call_package_path, empty_arg, file } => {
NixpkgsProblem::MovedOutOfByNameEmptyArg { package_name, call_package_path, file } => {
let call_package_arg =
if let Some(path) = &call_package_path {
format!("./{}", path.display())
} else {
"...".into()
};
if *empty_arg {
writedoc!(
f,
"
- Attribute `pkgs.{package_name} was previously defined in {}, but is now manually defined as `callPackage {call_package_arg} {{ /* ... */ }}` in {}.
Please move the package back and remove the manual `callPackage`.
",
structure::relative_file_for_package(package_name).display(),
file.display(),
)
} else {
// This can happen if users mistakenly assume that for custom arguments,
// pkgs/by-name can't be used.
writedoc!(
f,
"
- Attribute `pkgs.{package_name}` was previously defined in {}, but is now manually defined as `callPackage {call_package_arg} {{ ... }}` in {}.
While the manual `callPackage` is still needed, it's not necessary to move the package files.
",
structure::relative_file_for_package(package_name).display(),
file.display(),
)
}
writedoc!(
f,
"
- Attribute `pkgs.{package_name}` was previously defined in {}, but is now manually defined as `callPackage {call_package_arg} {{ /* ... */ }}` in {}.
Please move the package back and remove the manual `callPackage`.
",
structure::relative_file_for_package(package_name).display(),
file.display(),
)
},
NixpkgsProblem::NewPackageNotUsingByName { package_name, call_package_path, empty_arg, file } => {
NixpkgsProblem::MovedOutOfByNameNonEmptyArg { package_name, call_package_path, file } => {
let call_package_arg =
if let Some(path) = &call_package_path {
format!("./{}", path.display())
} else {
"...".into()
};
let extra =
if *empty_arg {
format!("Since the second `callPackage` argument is `{{ }}`, no manual `callPackage` in {} is needed anymore.", file.display())
// This can happen if users mistakenly assume that for custom arguments,
// pkgs/by-name can't be used.
writedoc!(
f,
"
- Attribute `pkgs.{package_name}` was previously defined in {}, but is now manually defined as `callPackage {call_package_arg} {{ ... }}` in {}.
While the manual `callPackage` is still needed, it's not necessary to move the package files.
",
structure::relative_file_for_package(package_name).display(),
file.display(),
)
},
NixpkgsProblem::NewPackageNotUsingByNameEmptyArg { package_name, call_package_path, file } => {
let call_package_arg =
if let Some(path) = &call_package_path {
format!("./{}", path.display())
} else {
format!("Since the second `callPackage` argument is not `{{ }}`, the manual `callPackage` in {} is still needed.", file.display())
"...".into()
};
writedoc!(
f,
@ -392,9 +393,29 @@ impl fmt::Display for NixpkgsProblem {
- Attribute `pkgs.{package_name}` is a new top-level package using `pkgs.callPackage {call_package_arg} {{ /* ... */ }}`.
Please define it in {} instead.
See `pkgs/by-name/README.md` for more details.
{extra}
Since the second `callPackage` argument is `{{ }}`, no manual `callPackage` in {} is needed anymore.
",
structure::relative_file_for_package(package_name).display(),
file.display(),
)
},
NixpkgsProblem::NewPackageNotUsingByNameNonEmptyArg { package_name, call_package_path, file } => {
let call_package_arg =
if let Some(path) = &call_package_path {
format!("./{}", path.display())
} else {
"...".into()
};
writedoc!(
f,
"
- Attribute `pkgs.{package_name}` is a new top-level package using `pkgs.callPackage {call_package_arg} {{ /* ... */ }}`.
Please define it in {} instead.
See `pkgs/by-name/README.md` for more details.
Since the second `callPackage` argument is not `{{ }}`, the manual `callPackage` in {} is still needed.
",
structure::relative_file_for_package(package_name).display(),
file.display(),
)
},
NixpkgsProblem::InternalCallPackageUsed { attr_name } =>
@ -426,14 +447,13 @@ fn indent_definition(column: usize, definition: String) -> String {
/// Creates a Nix path expression that when put into Nix file `from_file`, would point to the `to_file`.
fn create_path_expr(from_file: impl AsRef<Path>, to_file: impl AsRef<Path>) -> String {
// FIXME: Clean these unwrap's up
// But these should never trigger because we only call this function with relative paths, and only
// with `from_file` being an actual file (so there's always a parent)
// These `expect` calls should never trigger because we only call this function with
// relative paths that have a parent. That's why we `expect` them!
let from = RelativePath::from_path(&from_file)
.unwrap()
.expect("a relative path")
.parent()
.unwrap();
let to = RelativePath::from_path(&to_file).unwrap();
.expect("a parent for this path");
let to = RelativePath::from_path(&to_file).expect("a path");
let rel = from.relative(to);
format!("./{rel}")
}

20
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/src/ratchet.rs
View file

@ -154,17 +154,29 @@ impl ToNixpkgsProblem for UsesByName {
(to, file): &Self::ToContext,
) -> NixpkgsProblem {
if let Some(()) = optional_from {
NixpkgsProblem::MovedOutOfByName {
if to.empty_arg {
NixpkgsProblem::MovedOutOfByNameEmptyArg {
package_name: name.to_owned(),
call_package_path: to.relative_path.clone(),
file: file.to_owned(),
}
} else {
NixpkgsProblem::MovedOutOfByNameNonEmptyArg {
package_name: name.to_owned(),
call_package_path: to.relative_path.clone(),
file: file.to_owned(),
}
}
} else if to.empty_arg {
NixpkgsProblem::NewPackageNotUsingByNameEmptyArg {
package_name: name.to_owned(),
call_package_path: to.relative_path.clone(),
empty_arg: to.empty_arg,
file: file.to_owned(),
}
} else {
NixpkgsProblem::NewPackageNotUsingByName {
NixpkgsProblem::NewPackageNotUsingByNameNonEmptyArg {
package_name: name.to_owned(),
call_package_path: to.relative_path.clone(),
empty_arg: to.empty_arg,
file: file.to_owned(),
}
}

5
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/alt-callPackage/expected
View file

@ -2,9 +2,8 @@
foo = callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/fo/foo/package.nix { /* ... */ };
This is however not the case: A different `callPackage` is used.
It is defined in all-packages.nix:5 as
However, in this PR, a different `callPackage` is used. See the definition in all-packages.nix:5:
foo = self.alt.callPackage ({ }: self.someDrv) { };
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/base-fixed/expected
View file

@ -1 +1 @@
The base branch was broken, but this PR fixes it, nice job!
The base branch is broken, but this PR fixes it. Nice job!

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/base-still-broken/expected
View file

@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
pkgs/by-name/bar: This is a file, but it should be a directory.
The base branch is broken and still has above problems with this PR, these need to be fixed first.
The base branch is broken and still has above problems with this PR, which need to be fixed first.
Consider reverting the PR that introduced these problems in order to prevent more failures of unrelated PRs.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/broken-autocall/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs.foo: This attribute is not defined but it should be defined automatically as pkgs/by-name/fo/foo/package.nix
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/incorrect-shard/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs/by-name/aa/FOO: Incorrect directory location, should be pkgs/by-name/fo/FOO instead.
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/internalCallPackage/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs.foo: This attribute is defined using `_internalCallByNamePackageFile`, which is an internal function not intended for manual use.
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/invalid-package-name/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs/by-name/fo/fo@: Invalid package directory name "fo@", must be ASCII characters consisting of a-z, A-Z, 0-9, "-" or "_".
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/invalid-shard-name/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs/by-name/A: Invalid directory name "A", must be at most 2 ASCII characters consisting of a-z, 0-9, "-" or "_".
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

8
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/manual-definition/expected
View file

@ -2,8 +2,7 @@
noEval = callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/no/noEval/package.nix { /* ... */ };
Notably the second argument must not be empty, which is not the case.
It is defined in all-packages.nix:9 as
However, in this PR, the second argument is empty. See the definition in all-packages.nix:9:
noEval = self.callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/no/noEval/package.nix { };
@ -11,9 +10,8 @@
onlyMove = callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/on/onlyMove/package.nix { /* ... */ };
Notably the second argument must not be empty, which is not the case.
It is defined in all-packages.nix:7 as
However, in this PR, the second argument is empty. See the definition in all-packages.nix:7:
onlyMove = self.callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/on/onlyMove/package.nix { };
This PR introduces the above problems compared to the base branch, merging is discouraged, but would not break the base branch
This PR introduces additional instances of discouraged patterns as listed above. Merging is discouraged but would not break the base branch.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/missing-package-nix/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs/by-name/fo/foo: Missing required "package.nix" file.
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

6
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/move-to-non-by-name/expected
View file

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
- Attribute `pkgs.foo1 was previously defined in pkgs/by-name/fo/foo1/package.nix, but is now manually defined as `callPackage ... { /* ... */ }` in /home/tweagysil/src/nixpkgs/by-name-improv/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/move-to-non-by-name/all-packages.nix.
- Attribute `pkgs.foo1` was previously defined in pkgs/by-name/fo/foo1/package.nix, but is now manually defined as `callPackage ... { /* ... */ }` in /home/tweagysil/src/nixpkgs/by-name-improv/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/move-to-non-by-name/all-packages.nix.
Please move the package back and remove the manual `callPackage`.
- Attribute `pkgs.foo2 was previously defined in pkgs/by-name/fo/foo2/package.nix, but is now manually defined as `callPackage ./without-config.nix { /* ... */ }` in /home/tweagysil/src/nixpkgs/by-name-improv/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/move-to-non-by-name/all-packages.nix.
- Attribute `pkgs.foo2` was previously defined in pkgs/by-name/fo/foo2/package.nix, but is now manually defined as `callPackage ./without-config.nix { /* ... */ }` in /home/tweagysil/src/nixpkgs/by-name-improv/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/move-to-non-by-name/all-packages.nix.
Please move the package back and remove the manual `callPackage`.
- Attribute `pkgs.foo3` was previously defined in pkgs/by-name/fo/foo3/package.nix, but is now manually defined as `callPackage ... { ... }` in /home/tweagysil/src/nixpkgs/by-name-improv/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/move-to-non-by-name/all-packages.nix.
@ -10,4 +10,4 @@
- Attribute `pkgs.foo4` was previously defined in pkgs/by-name/fo/foo4/package.nix, but is now manually defined as `callPackage ./with-config.nix { ... }` in /home/tweagysil/src/nixpkgs/by-name-improv/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/move-to-non-by-name/all-packages.nix.
While the manual `callPackage` is still needed, it's not necessary to move the package files.
This PR introduces the above problems compared to the base branch, merging is discouraged, but would not break the base branch
This PR introduces additional instances of discouraged patterns as listed above. Merging is discouraged but would not break the base branch.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/multiple-failures/expected
View file

@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ pkgs/by-name/ba/foo: File package.nix at line 3 contains the path expression "..
pkgs/by-name/ba/foo: File package.nix at line 4 contains the nix search path expression "<nixpkgs>" which may point outside the directory of that package.
pkgs/by-name/ba/foo: File package.nix at line 5 contains the path expression "./${"test"}", which is not yet supported and may point outside the directory of that package.
pkgs/by-name/fo/foo: Missing required "package.nix" file.
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/new-package-non-by-name/expected
View file

@ -18,4 +18,4 @@
See `pkgs/by-name/README.md` for more details.
Since the second `callPackage` argument is not `{ }`, the manual `callPackage` in /home/tweagysil/src/nixpkgs/by-name-improv/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/new-package-non-by-name/all-packages.nix is still needed.
This PR introduces the above problems compared to the base branch, merging is discouraged, but would not break the base branch
This PR introduces additional instances of discouraged patterns as listed above. Merging is discouraged but would not break the base branch.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/non-attrs/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs.nonDerivation: This attribute defined by pkgs/by-name/no/nonDerivation/package.nix is not a derivation
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/non-derivation/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs.nonDerivation: This attribute defined by pkgs/by-name/no/nonDerivation/package.nix is not a derivation
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

1
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/non-syntactical-callPackage-by-name/all-packages.nix
View file

@ -2,4 +2,5 @@ self: super: {
bar = (x: x) self.callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/fo/foo/package.nix { someFlag = true; };
foo = self.bar;
}

5
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/non-syntactical-callPackage-by-name/expected
View file

@ -2,9 +2,8 @@
foo = callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/fo/foo/package.nix { /* ... */ };
This is however not the case.
It is defined in all-packages.nix:4 as
However, in this PR, it isn't defined that way. See the definition in all-packages.nix:4
foo = self.bar;
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

5
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/override-different-file/expected
View file

@ -2,9 +2,8 @@
nonDerivation = callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/no/nonDerivation/package.nix { /* ... */ };
This is however not the case: The first `callPackage` argument is the wrong path.
It is defined in all-packages.nix:2:3 as
However, in this PR, the first `callPackage` argument is the wrong path. See the definition in all-packages.nix:2:
nonDerivation = callPackage ./someDrv.nix { /* ... */ };
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

5
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/override-empty-arg/expected
View file

@ -2,9 +2,8 @@
nonDerivation = callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/no/nonDerivation/package.nix { /* ... */ };
Notably the second argument must not be empty, which is not the case.
It is defined in all-packages.nix:2 as
However, in this PR, the second argument is empty. See the definition in all-packages.nix:2:
nonDerivation = self.callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/no/nonDerivation/package.nix { };
This PR introduces the above problems compared to the base branch, merging is discouraged, but would not break the base branch
This PR introduces additional instances of discouraged patterns as listed above. Merging is discouraged but would not break the base branch.

5
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/override-no-call-package/expected
View file

@ -2,9 +2,8 @@
nonDerivation = callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/no/nonDerivation/package.nix { /* ... */ };
This is however not the case.
It is defined in all-packages.nix:2 as
However, in this PR, it isn't defined that way. See the definition in all-packages.nix:2
nonDerivation = self.someDrv;
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

5
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/override-no-file/expected
View file

@ -2,9 +2,8 @@
nonDerivation = callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/no/nonDerivation/package.nix { /* ... */ };
This is however not the case: The first callPackage argument is not right:
It is defined in all-packages.nix:2 as
However, in this PR, the first `callPackage` argument is not a path. See the definition in all-packages.nix:2:
nonDerivation = self.callPackage ({ someDrv }: someDrv) { };
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

5
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/override-non-path/expected
View file

@ -2,9 +2,8 @@
foo = callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/fo/foo/package.nix { /* ... */ };
This is however not the case: The first callPackage argument is not right:
It is defined in all-packages.nix:3 as
However, in this PR, the first `callPackage` argument is not a path. See the definition in all-packages.nix:3:
foo = self.callPackage ({ someDrv, someFlag }: someDrv) { someFlag = true; };
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/package-dir-is-file/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs/by-name/fo/foo: This path is a file, but it should be a directory.
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/package-nix-dir/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs/by-name/fo/foo: "package.nix" must be a file.
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/ref-absolute/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs/by-name/aa/aa: File package.nix at line 2 contains the path expression "/foo" which cannot be resolved: No such file or directory (os error 2).
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/ref-escape/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs/by-name/aa/aa: File package.nix at line 2 contains the path expression "../." which may point outside the directory of that package.
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/ref-nix-path/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs/by-name/aa/aa: File package.nix at line 2 contains the nix search path expression "<nixpkgs>" which may point outside the directory of that package.
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/ref-path-subexpr/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs/by-name/aa/aa: File package.nix at line 2 contains the path expression "./${"test"}", which is not yet supported and may point outside the directory of that package.
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/shard-file/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs/by-name/fo: This is a file, but it should be a directory.
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

8
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/sorted-order/expected
View file

@ -2,8 +2,7 @@
a = callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/a/a/package.nix { /* ... */ };
Notably the second argument must not be empty, which is not the case.
It is defined in all-packages.nix:2 as
However, in this PR, the second argument is empty. See the definition in all-packages.nix:2:
a = self.callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/a/a/package.nix { };
@ -16,8 +15,7 @@
c = callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/c/c/package.nix { /* ... */ };
Notably the second argument must not be empty, which is not the case.
It is defined in all-packages.nix:4 as
However, in this PR, the second argument is empty. See the definition in all-packages.nix:4:
c = self.callPackage ./pkgs/by-name/c/c/package.nix { };
@ -26,4 +24,4 @@
See `pkgs/by-name/README.md` for more details.
Since the second `callPackage` argument is `{ }`, no manual `callPackage` in /home/tweagysil/src/nixpkgs/by-name-improv/pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/sorted-order/all-packages.nix is needed anymore.
This PR introduces the above problems compared to the base branch, merging is discouraged, but would not break the base branch
This PR introduces additional instances of discouraged patterns as listed above. Merging is discouraged but would not break the base branch.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/symlink-escape/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs/by-name/fo/foo: Path package.nix is a symlink pointing to a path outside the directory of that package.
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/symlink-invalid/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs/by-name/fo/foo: Path foo is a symlink which cannot be resolved: No such file or directory (os error 2).
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.

2
pkgs/test/nixpkgs-check-by-name/tests/unknown-location/expected
View file

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
pkgs.foo: Cannot determine the location of this attribute using `builtins.unsafeGetAttrPos`.
This PR introduces the above problems, merging would break the base branch
This PR introduces the problems listed above. Please fix them before merging, otherwise the base branch would break.