doc: Describe CC Wrapper in more detail
The main motivation for this is to have something to google for LD=$CC. Eventually, this should probably be moved to another section, but we can deal with that later.
This commit is contained in:
parent
b6a746daa1
commit
0578dda8e1
1 changed files with 31 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
|
|||
|
||||
<chapter xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"
|
||||
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
|
||||
xml:id="chap-stdenv">
|
||||
|
@ -1342,12 +1343,34 @@ someVar=$(stripHash $name)
|
|||
<variablelist>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
<term>GCC wrapper</term>
|
||||
<listitem><para>Adds the <filename>include</filename> subdirectory
|
||||
of each build input to the <envar>NIX_CFLAGS_COMPILE</envar>
|
||||
environment variable, and the <filename>lib</filename> and
|
||||
<filename>lib64</filename> subdirectories to
|
||||
<envar>NIX_LDFLAGS</envar>.</para></listitem>
|
||||
<term>CC Wrapper</term>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
CC Wrapper wraps a C toolchain for a bunch of miscellaneous purposes.
|
||||
Specifically, a C compiler (GCC or Clang), Binutils (or the CCTools + binutils mashup when targetting Darwin), and a C standard library (glibc or Darwin's libSystem) are all fed in, and dependency finding, hardening (see below), and purity checks for each are handled by CC Wrapper.
|
||||
Packages typically depend on only CC Wrapper, instead of those 3 inputs directly.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Dependency finding is undoubtedly the main task of CC wrapper.
|
||||
It is currently accomplished by collecting directories of host-platform dependencies (i.e. <varname>buildInputs</varname> and <varname>nativeBuildInputs</varname>) in environment variables.
|
||||
CC wrapper's setup hook causes any <filename>include</filename> subdirectory of such a dependency to be added to <envar>NIX_CFLAGS_COMPILE</envar>, and any <filename>lib</filename> and <filename>lib64</filename> subdirectories to <envar>NIX_LDFLAGS</envar>.
|
||||
The setup hook itself contains some lengthy comments describing the exact convoluted mechanism by which this is accomplished.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
A final task of the setup hook is defining a number of standard environment variables to tell build systems which executables full-fill which purpose.
|
||||
They are defined to just be the base name of the tools, under the assumption that CC Wrapper's binaries will be on the path.
|
||||
Firstly, this helps poorly-written packages, e.g. ones that look for just <command>gcc</command> when <envar>CC</envar> isn't defined yet <command>clang</command> is to be used.
|
||||
Secondly, this helps packages not get confused when cross-compiling, in which case multiple CC wrappers may be simultaneous in use (targeting different platforms).
|
||||
<envar>BUILD_</envar>- and <envar>TARGET_</envar>-prefixed versions of the normal environment variable are defined for the additional CC Wrappers, properly disambiguating them.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
A problem with this final task is that CC Wrapper is honest and defines <envar>LD</envar> as <command>ld</command>.
|
||||
Most packages, however, firstly use the C compiler for linking, secondly use <envar>LD</envar> anyways, defining it as the C compiler, and thirdly, only so define <envar>LD</envar> when it is undefined as a fallback.
|
||||
This triple-threat means CC Wrapper will break those packages, as LD is already defined as the actually linker which the package won't override yet doesn't want to use.
|
||||
The workaround is to define, just for the problematic package, <envar>LD</envar> as the C compiler.
|
||||
A good way to do this would be <command>preConfigure = "LD=$CC"</command>.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue